Modal Triplet Theory and Calabi–Yau Compactification: A Conditional Realization Map and Its Selection Boundary

A Calabi–Yau compactification is not specified by a six-dimensional metric alone. It also requires topology, complex and Kähler data, gauge bundles and connections, anomaly cancellation, a supersymmetry convention, and a declared worldsheet or effective-field-theory approximation. This paper asks what Modal Triplet Theory (MTT) presently establishes about that complete object. We define a typed realization map from an upper MTT configuration to a lower Calabi–Yau compactification record and prove the corresponding conditional realization theorem: if one MTT source emits every required row and its reduction factors through the standard compactification functional, then both descriptions give the same declared lower data. This is an exact embedding statement, not a derivation or selection of a unique Calabi–Yau vacuum. We also isolate the analytic conditions under which spectral gaps, harmonic projectors, and commuting modal operators are available. A positive gap and bounded harmonic projector hold for each fixed compact elliptic problem; uniformity over moduli and operator commutation require additional non-collapsing or product hypotheses. A flat six-torus gives an elementary compatibility witness but not realistic four-dimensional phenomenology. The selected q=79 Fu–Yau program is a distinct non-Kähler torsional branch and cannot serve as a proof of a strict Calabi–Yau corner. The outcome is a precise and reusable realization contract, with unique-vacuum selection, moduli stabilization, and phenomenological prediction retained as independent open problems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21707791
Primary Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Modal Triplet Theory and Calabi–Yau Compactification: A Conditional Realization Map and Its Selection Boundary

Peter Nero
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
preprint

Modal Triplet Theory and Calabi–Yau Compactification: A Conditional Realization Map and Its Selection Boundary

Peter Nero
preprint en

Abstract

A Calabi–Yau compactification is not specified by a six-dimensional metric alone. It also requires topology, complex and Kähler data, gauge bundles and connections, anomaly cancellation, a supersymmetry convention, and a declared worldsheet or effective-field-theory approximation. This paper asks what Modal Triplet Theory (MTT) presently establishes about that complete object. We define a typed realization map from an upper MTT configuration to a lower Calabi–Yau compactification record and prove the corresponding conditional realization theorem: if one MTT source emits every required row and its reduction factors through the standard compactification functional, then both descriptions give the same declared lower data. This is an exact embedding statement, not a derivation or selection of a unique Calabi–Yau vacuum. We also isolate the analytic conditions under which spectral gaps, harmonic projectors, and commuting modal operators are available. A positive gap and bounded harmonic projector hold for each fixed compact elliptic problem; uniformity over moduli and operator commutation require additional non-collapsing or product hypotheses. A flat six-torus gives an elementary compatibility witness but not realistic four-dimensional phenomenology. The selected q=79 Fu–Yau program is a distinct non-Kähler torsional branch and cannot serve as a proof of a strict Calabi–Yau corner. The outcome is a precise and reusable realization contract, with unique-vacuum selection, moduli stabilization, and phenomenological prediction retained as independent open problems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.