Political Budget Cycles in the Philippines: Evidence from Subnational Fiscal Data

This paper documents patterns consistent with political budget cycles in the Philippines using provincial fiscal data from the Bureau of Local Government Finance for 81 provinces from 2012 to 2022, spanning four local elections. We examine how the level and composition of government spending, as well as provincial fund balances, change in the year preceding elections. Using fixed effects and restricted-instrument dynamic panel GMM estimates, with the CPI interaction evaluated at the sample-mean CPI, we find a positive total-spending association in difference GMM and positive fixed-effects associations for education spending and capital outlay. The evidence does not support pre-election increases in social welfare spending or fund balances. These findings provide qualified subnational evidence consistent with political budget cycle incentives while highlighting the additional political variation required for causal tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Finance Review
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421261472811
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political Budget Cycles in the Philippines: Evidence from Subnational Fiscal Data

Jan Carlo B. Punongbayan, Samantha Denise V. Sacluti, Karlena Ameina B. Saturnino
Public Finance Review
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
article

Political Budget Cycles in the Philippines: Evidence from Subnational Fiscal Data

Jan Carlo B. Punongbayan, Samantha Denise V. Sacluti, Karlena Ameina B. Saturnino
article en

Abstract

This paper documents patterns consistent with political budget cycles in the Philippines using provincial fiscal data from the Bureau of Local Government Finance for 81 provinces from 2012 to 2022, spanning four local elections. We examine how the level and composition of government spending, as well as provincial fund balances, change in the year preceding elections. Using fixed effects and restricted-instrument dynamic panel GMM estimates, with the CPI interaction evaluated at the sample-mean CPI, we find a positive total-spending association in difference GMM and positive fixed-effects associations for education spending and capital outlay. The evidence does not support pre-election increases in social welfare spending or fund balances. These findings provide qualified subnational evidence consistent with political budget cycle incentives while highlighting the additional political variation required for causal tests.

Public Finance Review
University of the Philippines Diliman (PH)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.