Parental perspectives of prenatal counseling and decision making for termination or hospice birth due to fetal congenital heart defects

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perspectives of counseling and decision making among birthing parents who chose termination or hospice birth due to a fetal congenital heart defect (CHD). METHODS: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with birthing parents who chose either termination or hospice birth due to severe fetal CHD. Participants were recruited from a purposive sample of those who received multidisciplinary counseling at a tertiary congenital heart surgical center between 2019-2023. Thematic analysis was conducted in five stages, using an integrated deductive-inductive approach. RESULTS: In total, 20 individuals were eligible; 10 completed interviews. Identified themes were categorized in two domains: Experiences During Counseling and Individual Factors Affecting Decision Making. Themes in the first domain included: areas for improvement during counseling, perceived strengths of counseling, patient attributes affecting counseling, and views on provider recommendations. Themes in the second domain included: emotions affecting decision making, value for reproductive autonomy, family factors, internal factors, outside input, and desire for resources. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, birthing parents who chose termination or hospice for fetal CHD appreciated information extending beyond clinical outcomes to include family and financial impacts. Their value for reproductive autonomy reflects the need for clinicians to gain skills in empathetic and neutral counseling of all management options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353868
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental perspectives of prenatal counseling and decision making for termination or hospice birth due to fetal congenital heart defects

Natalia Henner, Jessica T. Fry, William A. Grobman, Angira Patel et al.
PLoS ONE
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
article

Parental perspectives of prenatal counseling and decision making for termination or hospice birth due to fetal congenital heart defects

Natalia Henner, Jessica T. Fry, William A. Grobman, Angira Patel, Joyce Woo, Leonardo Barrera, Grace Knowles, Harshman Sihra, Diana Madden, Sheetal Patel, Lynn M. Yee
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perspectives of counseling and decision making among birthing parents who chose termination or hospice birth due to a fetal congenital heart defect (CHD). METHODS: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with birthing parents who chose either termination or hospice birth due to severe fetal CHD. Participants were recruited from a purposive sample of those who received multidisciplinary counseling at a tertiary congenital heart surgical center between 2019-2023. Thematic analysis was conducted in five stages, using an integrated deductive-inductive approach. RESULTS: In total, 20 individuals were eligible; 10 completed interviews. Identified themes were categorized in two domains: Experiences During Counseling and Individual Factors Affecting Decision Making. Themes in the first domain included: areas for improvement during counseling, perceived strengths of counseling, patient attributes affecting counseling, and views on provider recommendations. Themes in the second domain included: emotions affecting decision making, value for reproductive autonomy, family factors, internal factors, outside input, and desire for resources. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, birthing parents who chose termination or hospice for fetal CHD appreciated information extending beyond clinical outcomes to include family and financial impacts. Their value for reproductive autonomy reflects the need for clinicians to gain skills in empathetic and neutral counseling of all management options.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Northwestern University (US), Brown University (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.