The Paradox of Economic Development

Economic development today is trapped in a costly, wasteful, and largely ineffective incentive game, even as the bidding wars between cities and states continue to escalate. States and localities now spend between $45 and $90 billion a year on economic development incentives, depending on the estimate, with individual deals routinely costing hundreds of thousands of dollars per job created. The absurdity of the Amazon HQ2 contest and other megadeals makes the paradox plain: even when local leaders know incentives don’t work, they feel they cannot walk away. There is a way out of this trap, but it requires more than better research. It requires a compact between states, cities, professional economic developers, and researchers built around two goals: ending the incentive competition that has defined the field for 40 years and redirecting those resources into place-based investments in people, innovation, and communities that actually work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Development Quarterly
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424261470320
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Paradox of Economic Development

Richard Florida
Economic Development Quarterly
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
article

The Paradox of Economic Development

Richard Florida
article en

Abstract

Economic development today is trapped in a costly, wasteful, and largely ineffective incentive game, even as the bidding wars between cities and states continue to escalate. States and localities now spend between $45 and $90 billion a year on economic development incentives, depending on the estimate, with individual deals routinely costing hundreds of thousands of dollars per job created. The absurdity of the Amazon HQ2 contest and other megadeals makes the paradox plain: even when local leaders know incentives don’t work, they feel they cannot walk away. There is a way out of this trap, but it requires more than better research. It requires a compact between states, cities, professional economic developers, and researchers built around two goals: ending the incentive competition that has defined the field for 40 years and redirecting those resources into place-based investments in people, innovation, and communities that actually work.

Economic Development Quarterly
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.