Experiences of Managing Indigenous Australian Music Metadata in Large Institutional Collections

Library and archival staff in Australia face issues when managing the metadata of their Indigenous music collections. Common standards such as MARC and Dublin Core struggle to accommodate the complexities inherent in describing and making accessible Indigenous music material. This risks losing interoperability with other systems, which can also influence a collection’s accessibility. This article explores contemporary issues faced by Australian collection staff when managing the metadata of their Indigenous music material. It suggests that no single metadata or transmission standard currently in existence can appropriately describe all Indigenous music material, and a collection manager’s choice of standard(s) is often informed by the held material. The choice of standard(s) also affects a collection’s accessibility and interoperability. This article identifies current challenges that will need to be addressed by the libraries and archives sector to improve the accessibility of Indigenous music material, including appropriate description of Indigenous languages, cultural sensitivities and access protocols. These challenges present obstacles for Universal Bibliographic Control (UBC) in libraries and question whether UBC is compatible with certain types of Indigenous cultural heritage material. In doing so, it contributes to the intersections of musicology/ethnomusicology, Australian Indigenous studies, library and information science and archival studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2026.2706986
Primary Topic
Diverse Musicological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of Managing Indigenous Australian Music Metadata in Large Institutional Collections

Caleb Triscari
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
Diverse Musicological Studies
article

Experiences of Managing Indigenous Australian Music Metadata in Large Institutional Collections

Caleb Triscari
article en

Abstract

Library and archival staff in Australia face issues when managing the metadata of their Indigenous music collections. Common standards such as MARC and Dublin Core struggle to accommodate the complexities inherent in describing and making accessible Indigenous music material. This risks losing interoperability with other systems, which can also influence a collection’s accessibility. This article explores contemporary issues faced by Australian collection staff when managing the metadata of their Indigenous music material. It suggests that no single metadata or transmission standard currently in existence can appropriately describe all Indigenous music material, and a collection manager’s choice of standard(s) is often informed by the held material. The choice of standard(s) also affects a collection’s accessibility and interoperability. This article identifies current challenges that will need to be addressed by the libraries and archives sector to improve the accessibility of Indigenous music material, including appropriate description of Indigenous languages, cultural sensitivities and access protocols. These challenges present obstacles for Universal Bibliographic Control (UBC) in libraries and question whether UBC is compatible with certain types of Indigenous cultural heritage material. In doing so, it contributes to the intersections of musicology/ethnomusicology, Australian Indigenous studies, library and information science and archival studies.

Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Diverse Musicological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.