Sustainable and inclusive wellbeing governance: Reinventing democracy after the crisis

Despite decades of advances in sustainability science, global progress on climate change, biodiversity loss, inequality, and human wellbeing remains dangerously inadequate. While these failures are often attributed to insufficient political will or contested knowledge, we argue that a more fundamental constraint lies in how collective decisions are made. Contemporary governance systems are increasingly shaped by concentrated economic and political power, undermining their capacity to act in the collective interest and to pursue long-term sustainability goals. At the same time, there is growing evidence that citizens broadly support transformative policies aimed at sustainable and inclusive wellbeing. We argue that governance design itself has become a critical leverage point for sustainability transitions. For example, deliberative democracy offers an alternative by representing shared societal values and goals through randomly selected citizens' assemblies. Such assemblies operate independently of partisan and special-interest control and have demonstrated success at several scales. Advances in communication technology now make their broad application increasingly feasible. In parallel, new decision-making methods, such as sociocracy, emphasise consent over majority rule and provide tools to reduce polarization and foster inclusive agreements within deliberative processes. Viewed historically, today's governance challenges resemble recurrent crises and may offer a critical opening to adopt more sustainable and inclusive forms of governance, grounded in deliberation, consent, and collective wellbeing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109183
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable and inclusive wellbeing governance: Reinventing democracy after the crisis

Stewart Wallis, Hunter Lovins, Sandrine Dixson-Declève, Ida Kubiszewski et al.
Ecological Economics
Human Rights and Development
article

Sustainable and inclusive wellbeing governance: Reinventing democracy after the crisis

Stewart Wallis, Hunter Lovins, Sandrine Dixson-Declève, Ida Kubiszewski, Lorenzo Fioramonti, KV Ragnarsdottir, Roberto De Vogli, Robert Costanza, Enrico Giovannini, Lars Fogh Mortensen, Kate L. Pickett, Richard Wilkinson, Jacqueline McGlade
article en

Abstract

Despite decades of advances in sustainability science, global progress on climate change, biodiversity loss, inequality, and human wellbeing remains dangerously inadequate. While these failures are often attributed to insufficient political will or contested knowledge, we argue that a more fundamental constraint lies in how collective decisions are made. Contemporary governance systems are increasingly shaped by concentrated economic and political power, undermining their capacity to act in the collective interest and to pursue long-term sustainability goals. At the same time, there is growing evidence that citizens broadly support transformative policies aimed at sustainable and inclusive wellbeing. We argue that governance design itself has become a critical leverage point for sustainability transitions. For example, deliberative democracy offers an alternative by representing shared societal values and goals through randomly selected citizens' assemblies. Such assemblies operate independently of partisan and special-interest control and have demonstrated success at several scales. Advances in communication technology now make their broad application increasingly feasible. In parallel, new decision-making methods, such as sociocracy, emphasise consent over majority rule and provide tools to reduce polarization and foster inclusive agreements within deliberative processes. Viewed historically, today's governance challenges resemble recurrent crises and may offer a critical opening to adopt more sustainable and inclusive forms of governance, grounded in deliberation, consent, and collective wellbeing.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 251
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (IT), University of Nottingham (GB), University of Iceland (IS), Clinical Research Solutions (US), University Alliance (GB), University College London (GB), University of York (GB)
Leverhulme Trust, European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.