Icing-induced galloping and anti-galloping control of overhead transmission conductors and railway overhead contact systems

Icing-induced galloping is a low-frequency, large-amplitude aeroelastic instability that threatens both overhead transmission conductors and railway overhead contact systems (OCSs). Although these flexible cable systems share a common wind–ice–structure energy-transfer basis, their system-level responses, operational consequences, and engineering constraints differ substantially. This review synthesizes recent progress in galloping hazards, excitation mechanisms, aerodynamic characterization, dynamic response analysis, experimental investigations, field observations, and mitigation technologies for both infrastructure systems. For transmission conductors, relatively mature research frameworks have been developed around sectional aerodynamic instability, vertical–torsional coupling, bundled-conductor wake interference, spacer constraints, geometric nonlinearity, and tower–line coupling. In contrast, OCS galloping remains less fully understood because contact-wire sectional details, tension-only dropper behavior, discrete registration constraints, pantograph–catenary interaction, and current-collection requirements must be considered jointly. Existing mitigation strategies mainly focus on pre-event risk reduction through aerodynamic modification, structural-parameter adjustment, constraint control, damping enhancement, ice management, and operational measures, whereas rapid suppression after galloping onset remains insufficiently developed. The comparison indicates that assessment methods and mitigation devices cannot be transferred directly between transmission lines and OCSs on the basis of sectional aerodynamic similarity alone. Future research should emphasize long-term natural-icing monitoring, validated three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamic models, coupled wind–ice–structure simulations, system-specific field validation, data-driven early warning, and rapid-response control strategies to improve the resilience of power and railway infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of dynamic disasters.
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdd.2026.100070
Primary Topic
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Icing-induced galloping and anti-galloping control of overhead transmission conductors and railway overhead contact systems

Miao Liu, Yu Peng, Shuochen Yang, Nankui Cao et al.
Journal of dynamic disasters.
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
article

Icing-induced galloping and anti-galloping control of overhead transmission conductors and railway overhead contact systems

Miao Liu, Yu Peng, Shuochen Yang, Nankui Cao, Huawei Niu, Zheng Yang, Zhengqing Chen
article en

Abstract

Icing-induced galloping is a low-frequency, large-amplitude aeroelastic instability that threatens both overhead transmission conductors and railway overhead contact systems (OCSs). Although these flexible cable systems share a common wind–ice–structure energy-transfer basis, their system-level responses, operational consequences, and engineering constraints differ substantially. This review synthesizes recent progress in galloping hazards, excitation mechanisms, aerodynamic characterization, dynamic response analysis, experimental investigations, field observations, and mitigation technologies for both infrastructure systems. For transmission conductors, relatively mature research frameworks have been developed around sectional aerodynamic instability, vertical–torsional coupling, bundled-conductor wake interference, spacer constraints, geometric nonlinearity, and tower–line coupling. In contrast, OCS galloping remains less fully understood because contact-wire sectional details, tension-only dropper behavior, discrete registration constraints, pantograph–catenary interaction, and current-collection requirements must be considered jointly. Existing mitigation strategies mainly focus on pre-event risk reduction through aerodynamic modification, structural-parameter adjustment, constraint control, damping enhancement, ice management, and operational measures, whereas rapid suppression after galloping onset remains insufficiently developed. The comparison indicates that assessment methods and mitigation devices cannot be transferred directly between transmission lines and OCSs on the basis of sectional aerodynamic similarity alone. Future research should emphasize long-term natural-icing monitoring, validated three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamic models, coupled wind–ice–structure simulations, system-specific field validation, data-driven early warning, and rapid-response control strategies to improve the resilience of power and railway infrastructure.

Journal of dynamic disasters.Vol. 2(3)
Hunan University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.