Energetic cost of locomotion closely aligns with the preferred uphill walk–run transition at constant vertical speed in runners

PURPOSE: The determinants of the preferred walk-to-run transition speed (PTS) during uphill locomotion remain unclear when the rate of vertical ascent is controlled rather than allowed to vary with treadmill speed. This study examined whether spatiotemporal, biomechanical, cardiorespiratory and energetic variables provide crossover-based optimal transition speed (OTS) that align with PTS during incline locomotion at constant vertical speed. METHODS: 17 Endurance-trained runners performed randomized six-minute walking and running bouts at speeds from 0.55 to 2.50 m·s⁻¹ for walking and from 0.55 to 3.88 m·s⁻¹ for running, all conducted at a constant vertical speed of 800 m·h⁻¹. The PTS assessment protocol was designed to maintain a constant rate of vertical ascent throughout the test. RESULTS: cost of transport as well as metabolic power exhibited optimal transition speed that did not differ significantly from PTS, indicating a strong association between these energetic variables and the choice of gait. In contrast, heart rate, ventilation, and internal mechanical work displayed optimal transition speeds that were significantly different from PTS, while external and total mechanical work, step frequency, and step length showed no crossover between gaits. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that, under conditions of constant vertical speed, uphill PTS aligns more closely with energetic crossover criteria than with cardiorespiratory or mechanical-work-based crossovers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-026-06363-x
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energetic cost of locomotion closely aligns with the preferred uphill walk–run transition at constant vertical speed in runners

Davide Malatesta, Valentin Luc, Fabio Borrani, Sophie Carron et al.
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Sports Performance and Training
article

Energetic cost of locomotion closely aligns with the preferred uphill walk–run transition at constant vertical speed in runners

Davide Malatesta, Valentin Luc, Fabio Borrani, Sophie Carron, Louis Finiel, Chloé Margot
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The determinants of the preferred walk-to-run transition speed (PTS) during uphill locomotion remain unclear when the rate of vertical ascent is controlled rather than allowed to vary with treadmill speed. This study examined whether spatiotemporal, biomechanical, cardiorespiratory and energetic variables provide crossover-based optimal transition speed (OTS) that align with PTS during incline locomotion at constant vertical speed. METHODS: 17 Endurance-trained runners performed randomized six-minute walking and running bouts at speeds from 0.55 to 2.50 m·s⁻¹ for walking and from 0.55 to 3.88 m·s⁻¹ for running, all conducted at a constant vertical speed of 800 m·h⁻¹. The PTS assessment protocol was designed to maintain a constant rate of vertical ascent throughout the test. RESULTS: cost of transport as well as metabolic power exhibited optimal transition speed that did not differ significantly from PTS, indicating a strong association between these energetic variables and the choice of gait. In contrast, heart rate, ventilation, and internal mechanical work displayed optimal transition speeds that were significantly different from PTS, while external and total mechanical work, step frequency, and step length showed no crossover between gaits. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that, under conditions of constant vertical speed, uphill PTS aligns more closely with energetic crossover criteria than with cardiorespiratory or mechanical-work-based crossovers.

European Journal of Applied Physiology
University of Lausanne (CH)
Université de Lausanne
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.