Inadequate Digital Health Literacy – Conceptual Validity of a Nursing Diagnosis Proposal

Purpose To evaluate the conceptual validity of the proposed nursing diagnosis, Inadequate digital health literacy . Methods A concept analysis was conducted following Walker & Avant's methodological framework. An integrative literature review supported the analysis. Searches were performed in PubMed, BVS, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase for studies published from 2000 onward in English, Portuguese, or Spanish. The SPIDER framework guided the search strategy and eligibility criteria. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Extracted data included attributes, antecedents, consequences, prevalence estimates, and empirical measures related to inadequate digital health literacy. Identified elements were organized according to the NANDA International (NANDA-I) diagnostic structure, including defining characteristics, related factors, and at-risk populations. Findings Ten essential attributes supported the development of the diagnostic definition. Seventeen consequences informed the identification of 14 defining characteristics. Sixteen antecedents supported the identification of 11 related factors and 5 at-risk populations. Empirical referents were primarily self-report instruments used to assess digital health literacy, including the eHealth Literacy Scale, the Digital Health Literacy Instrument, the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire, and the eHealth Literacy Assessment Toolkit. A model case and a contrary case were developed. Conclusions The findings support the conceptual validity of Inadequate digital health literacy as a distinct human response not fully represented by existing NANDA-I diagnoses. The proposed structure clarifies defining characteristics, related factors, and at-risk populations. Implications for Nursing Practice Recognizing Inadequate digital health literacy as a nursing diagnosis may support more accurate clinical assessment and guide interventions aimed at improving clients’ ability to access, appraise, and use digital health resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Nursing Knowledge
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20473087261471630
Primary Topic
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inadequate Digital Health Literacy – Conceptual Validity of a Nursing Diagnosis Proposal

Camilla do Rosário Nicolino Chiorino, Daniele Cristina Bosco Aprile, Dolores Eunice Hernández-Herrera, Ana Paula Conceição et al.
International Journal of Nursing Knowledge
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
article

Inadequate Digital Health Literacy – Conceptual Validity of a Nursing Diagnosis Proposal

Camilla do Rosário Nicolino Chiorino, Daniele Cristina Bosco Aprile, Dolores Eunice Hernández-Herrera, Ana Paula Conceição, Camila Takáo Lopes, Alexia Louisie Pontes Gonçalves, Nora Hilda González-Quirarte, Hortensia Castañeda-Hidalgo, Edgar Noé Morelos-Garcia, Bianca Lorena Ligabo
article en

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the conceptual validity of the proposed nursing diagnosis, Inadequate digital health literacy . Methods A concept analysis was conducted following Walker & Avant's methodological framework. An integrative literature review supported the analysis. Searches were performed in PubMed, BVS, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase for studies published from 2000 onward in English, Portuguese, or Spanish. The SPIDER framework guided the search strategy and eligibility criteria. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Extracted data included attributes, antecedents, consequences, prevalence estimates, and empirical measures related to inadequate digital health literacy. Identified elements were organized according to the NANDA International (NANDA-I) diagnostic structure, including defining characteristics, related factors, and at-risk populations. Findings Ten essential attributes supported the development of the diagnostic definition. Seventeen consequences informed the identification of 14 defining characteristics. Sixteen antecedents supported the identification of 11 related factors and 5 at-risk populations. Empirical referents were primarily self-report instruments used to assess digital health literacy, including the eHealth Literacy Scale, the Digital Health Literacy Instrument, the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire, and the eHealth Literacy Assessment Toolkit. A model case and a contrary case were developed. Conclusions The findings support the conceptual validity of Inadequate digital health literacy as a distinct human response not fully represented by existing NANDA-I diagnoses. The proposed structure clarifies defining characteristics, related factors, and at-risk populations. Implications for Nursing Practice Recognizing Inadequate digital health literacy as a nursing diagnosis may support more accurate clinical assessment and guide interventions aimed at improving clients’ ability to access, appraise, and use digital health resources.

International Journal of Nursing Knowledge
Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia (BR), Autonomous University of Tamaulipas (MX), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.