Non-domination at work: two puzzles for liberal relational egalitarians

Christian Schemmel conceives the ideal of relational egalitarianism it as a halfway house between liberal egalitarianism and republicanism. The most important merit of his contribution is, however, that it gives flesh to the institutional demands of relational equality regarding to political participation, the distribution of income and opportunities, as well as healthcare. This paper suggests that a fourth domain is worth considering, namely: the workplace. After explaining why relational egalitarians should be concerned about workplace relationships, the paper presents two puzzles for them. The first concerns the extent to which domination ceases to be such when employers are compelled by market forces to interfere with their subordinates. The second inquires about the best institutional arrangement to secure relational equality at work. The paper examines three possible alternatives and concludes that none of them offers a silver bullet against domination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2026.2707009
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-domination at work: two puzzles for liberal relational egalitarians

Jahel Queralt
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Non-domination at work: two puzzles for liberal relational egalitarians

Jahel Queralt
article en

Abstract

Christian Schemmel conceives the ideal of relational egalitarianism it as a halfway house between liberal egalitarianism and republicanism. The most important merit of his contribution is, however, that it gives flesh to the institutional demands of relational equality regarding to political participation, the distribution of income and opportunities, as well as healthcare. This paper suggests that a fourth domain is worth considering, namely: the workplace. After explaining why relational egalitarians should be concerned about workplace relationships, the paper presents two puzzles for them. The first concerns the extent to which domination ceases to be such when employers are compelled by market forces to interfere with their subordinates. The second inquires about the best institutional arrangement to secure relational equality at work. The paper examines three possible alternatives and concludes that none of them offers a silver bullet against domination.

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.