Mitigation strategies for critical safety risks of SAVs in an eco-innovation context: Insights from thematic analysis

Shared level 4 automated vehicles (SAVs) are proposed as a solution to reduce road accidents caused by human error and to enhance overall traffic safety. However, safety continues to be a primary concern for SAVs. Addressing safety concerns requires not only technological solutions but also insights into socially informed perspectives and interventions to mitigate critical safety risks of SAV integrated into the public transport system. This paper investigates the socio-technical concerns of SAV by identifying the critical safety issues, their mitigation strategies and deriving theoretical insights and actionable implications for practice. Drawing on interviews with 47 CCAM experts and stakeholders from 11 European countries, we conduct thematic analysis to uncover recurring patterns and relationships across the dataset. Our analysis shows five interrelated themes on critical safety issues and eight themes on mitigation strategies shape SAV safety outcomes. These themes provide insight into complex socio-technical dynamics that influence the promise of safe integration of SAV into public transport systems. By synthesising these empirical patterns, we translate the patterns into practical implications that can support informed decision-making and enhance social conditions for the sustainable integration of SAV into the public transport system. Applying eco-innovation theory to structure our findings, we complement the existing stream of literature on mitigation strategies of critical safety risks of level 4 SAV beyond technocentric mitigation strategies to regulatory push/pull and demand-pull mechanisms. Thus, this paper enriches existing research by providing comprehensive and socially grounded understanding of mitigation strategies of critical safety risks of SAVs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Futures
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.102050
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigation strategies for critical safety risks of SAVs in an eco-innovation context: Insights from thematic analysis

Wale Arowolo, Evangelia Gaitanidou, Isabelle Nicolai
Sustainable Futures
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Mitigation strategies for critical safety risks of SAVs in an eco-innovation context: Insights from thematic analysis

Wale Arowolo, Evangelia Gaitanidou, Isabelle Nicolai
article en

Abstract

Shared level 4 automated vehicles (SAVs) are proposed as a solution to reduce road accidents caused by human error and to enhance overall traffic safety. However, safety continues to be a primary concern for SAVs. Addressing safety concerns requires not only technological solutions but also insights into socially informed perspectives and interventions to mitigate critical safety risks of SAV integrated into the public transport system. This paper investigates the socio-technical concerns of SAV by identifying the critical safety issues, their mitigation strategies and deriving theoretical insights and actionable implications for practice. Drawing on interviews with 47 CCAM experts and stakeholders from 11 European countries, we conduct thematic analysis to uncover recurring patterns and relationships across the dataset. Our analysis shows five interrelated themes on critical safety issues and eight themes on mitigation strategies shape SAV safety outcomes. These themes provide insight into complex socio-technical dynamics that influence the promise of safe integration of SAV into public transport systems. By synthesising these empirical patterns, we translate the patterns into practical implications that can support informed decision-making and enhance social conditions for the sustainable integration of SAV into the public transport system. Applying eco-innovation theory to structure our findings, we complement the existing stream of literature on mitigation strategies of critical safety risks of level 4 SAV beyond technocentric mitigation strategies to regulatory push/pull and demand-pull mechanisms. Thus, this paper enriches existing research by providing comprehensive and socially grounded understanding of mitigation strategies of critical safety risks of SAVs.

Sustainable FuturesVol. 12
Université Paris-Saclay (FR), CentraleSupélec (FR), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.