Sex Differences in Urinary Extracellular Vesicles Originating from the Genitourinary System in Health and Disease

Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) have risen to the forefront as a source of biomarkers in urine, a biofluid that can be obtained non-invasively in large quantities. These lipid bilayer-bound, anucleate particles contain molecular cargo which may reflect the pathology of disease processes affecting the urogenital and reproductive systems. Urinary EVs can be derived from a variety of organs including the kidney, bladder, and urethra, as well as the testis, epididymis, vas deferens, prostate, and seminal vesicles in males, or the uterus, vagina, and placenta (during pregnancy) in females, as well as from microbiota present in the bladder or urogenital tract, leading to differences in biomolecular cargo based on sex. Hormonal cycles, circadian rhythms, age and stress might further influence sex differences in uEVs. Despite growing interest in uEVs as biomarkers for renal and urological diseases, the majority of clinical studies to date have relied on urine samples from male-dominant cohorts, including investigations of sex chromosome-linked disorders. This sampling bias has contributed to a significant knowledge gap regarding sex-specific differences in uEV composition and function, which may critically influence disease mechanisms, diagnostic accuracy, and therapeutic targeting. Addressing this gap is essential for advancing the translational relevance and inclusivity of uEV-based research. This state-of-the-art review focuses on the current literature comparing male versus female uEVs using a variety of orthogonal methods across different studies. We also provide insights to address variability and improve rigor and reproducibility in uEV studies targeting both men's and women's health disorders, to move this field forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00402.2025
Primary Topic
Extracellular vesicles in disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Urinary Extracellular Vesicles Originating from the Genitourinary System in Health and Disease

Lindsey A. Burnett, Joshua Welsh, Elena Martens, Inge Varik et al.
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Extracellular vesicles in disease
article

Sex Differences in Urinary Extracellular Vesicles Originating from the Genitourinary System in Health and Disease

Lindsey A. Burnett, Joshua Welsh, Elena Martens, Inge Varik, Dylan Burger, Molly Fisher, Maija Puhka, Priyadarshini Pantham, Agne Velthut‐Meikas, Per Svenningsen, John Nolan, Elina Aleksejeva-Zagura, Uta Erdbrϋgger, Monica Suet Ying Ng, Karina Barreiro, Janne Leivo
article en

Abstract

Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) have risen to the forefront as a source of biomarkers in urine, a biofluid that can be obtained non-invasively in large quantities. These lipid bilayer-bound, anucleate particles contain molecular cargo which may reflect the pathology of disease processes affecting the urogenital and reproductive systems. Urinary EVs can be derived from a variety of organs including the kidney, bladder, and urethra, as well as the testis, epididymis, vas deferens, prostate, and seminal vesicles in males, or the uterus, vagina, and placenta (during pregnancy) in females, as well as from microbiota present in the bladder or urogenital tract, leading to differences in biomolecular cargo based on sex. Hormonal cycles, circadian rhythms, age and stress might further influence sex differences in uEVs. Despite growing interest in uEVs as biomarkers for renal and urological diseases, the majority of clinical studies to date have relied on urine samples from male-dominant cohorts, including investigations of sex chromosome-linked disorders. This sampling bias has contributed to a significant knowledge gap regarding sex-specific differences in uEV composition and function, which may critically influence disease mechanisms, diagnostic accuracy, and therapeutic targeting. Addressing this gap is essential for advancing the translational relevance and inclusivity of uEV-based research. This state-of-the-art review focuses on the current literature comparing male versus female uEVs using a variety of orthogonal methods across different studies. We also provide insights to address variability and improve rigor and reproducibility in uEV studies targeting both men's and women's health disorders, to move this field forward.

American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), University of Helsinki (FI), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Turku (FI), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), University of Virginia Health System (US), Erasmus MC (NL), IQVIA (United Kingdom) (GB), University of California San Diego (US), BD Biosciences (United States) (US), Cellectar Biosciences (United States) (US), Intellijoint Surgical (Canada) (CA)
American Diabetes Association, Eesti Teadusagentuur, National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Extracellular vesicles in disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.