When do social norms strategies reduce uncertainty and anxiety? The moderating role of psychological distance in crisis communication

Crises such as pandemics, wars, and environmental disasters disrupt public expectations and heighten uncertainty and anxiety. In these contexts, effective communication strategies are essential for helping individuals cope. Social-norm-based messages are often used to guide behavior and foster collective identity and emotional support, yet their cognitive and emotional impact in crisis communication remains underexplored. This study investigated whether and when social norms reduce uncertainty discrepancy and anxiety, and whether perceived psychological distance moderates these effects. A preregistered online experiment (N = 380) employed a between-subjects design, using the Fukushima nuclear wastewater release as the crisis stimulus. Contrary to expectations, no direct effects of descriptive or injunctive norms on uncertainty discrepancy or anxiety were found, nor did psychological distance moderate these effects. However, the exploratory findings revealed that the presence versus absence of social norms mattered in interaction with psychological distance: social-norm-based messages reduced anxiety among psychologically close individuals, whereas they reduced uncertainty discrepancy among psychologically moderate to distant participants. In addition, higher uncertainty discrepancy predicted higher anxiety. Theoretically, this study may extend social norms research by identifying a possible boundary condition, where the effect of social-norm-based messages weakens when intended outcomes shift from visible behaviors to internal cognitive or emotional states, and by pointing to the potential role of perceived psychological distance as a receiver-centered contextual factor. Practically, the findings tentatively suggest that crisis communicators may benefit from tailoring social-norm-based messages to audiences' psychological distance, emphasizing emotional support for psychologically close audiences and collective efficacy for distant ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Relations Review
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2026.102746
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When do social norms strategies reduce uncertainty and anxiety? The moderating role of psychological distance in crisis communication

Zeph van Berlo, Yajing Wang
Public Relations Review
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

When do social norms strategies reduce uncertainty and anxiety? The moderating role of psychological distance in crisis communication

Zeph van Berlo, Yajing Wang
article en

Abstract

Crises such as pandemics, wars, and environmental disasters disrupt public expectations and heighten uncertainty and anxiety. In these contexts, effective communication strategies are essential for helping individuals cope. Social-norm-based messages are often used to guide behavior and foster collective identity and emotional support, yet their cognitive and emotional impact in crisis communication remains underexplored. This study investigated whether and when social norms reduce uncertainty discrepancy and anxiety, and whether perceived psychological distance moderates these effects. A preregistered online experiment (N = 380) employed a between-subjects design, using the Fukushima nuclear wastewater release as the crisis stimulus. Contrary to expectations, no direct effects of descriptive or injunctive norms on uncertainty discrepancy or anxiety were found, nor did psychological distance moderate these effects. However, the exploratory findings revealed that the presence versus absence of social norms mattered in interaction with psychological distance: social-norm-based messages reduced anxiety among psychologically close individuals, whereas they reduced uncertainty discrepancy among psychologically moderate to distant participants. In addition, higher uncertainty discrepancy predicted higher anxiety. Theoretically, this study may extend social norms research by identifying a possible boundary condition, where the effect of social-norm-based messages weakens when intended outcomes shift from visible behaviors to internal cognitive or emotional states, and by pointing to the potential role of perceived psychological distance as a receiver-centered contextual factor. Practically, the findings tentatively suggest that crisis communicators may benefit from tailoring social-norm-based messages to audiences' psychological distance, emphasizing emotional support for psychologically close audiences and collective efficacy for distant ones.

Public Relations ReviewVol. 52(4)
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.