Sentencing Inequality and Social Stratification in Indonesia's 2023 Penal Code

The Indonesia 2023 Penal Code, which entered into force on January 2, 2026, formally adopts the double track sentencing system requiring imprisonment and fine sanctions to function as equal-value alternatives.No prior study has evaluated this code using regional minimum wage data as an economic benchmark.This normative legal study employed statutory and conceptual approaches, applying economic analysis of law to calculate the economic value of maximum imprisonment threats using Indonesia's 2023 regional minimum wage data and comparing these against provisioned fine sanctions.Reference value analysis indicated no consistent proportionality between fine sanction categories and imprisonment lengths across the five penal type categories.Economic analysis indicated that the equivalence relationship varies across sentencing categories and wage conditions: under higher wage assumptions fine values fall below the calculated imprisonment burden across most categories, while under lower wage assumptions fine values in several categories meet or exceed calculated imprisonment values, with the Medium category presenting the most persistent concern.The findings suggest the code does not apply a consistent equivalence principle the double track sentencing system requires, creating structural conditions that may contribute to wealth-based disparities in criminal justice outcomes.These findings reflect codified provisions rather than empirical practice; actual outcomes are subject to judicial discretion, and whether structural patterns translate into disparities will depend on judicial application.Future revisions should incorporate a structured sentencing equivalence framework derived from the regional minimum wage to ensure equitable outcomes regardless of offender economic status.Future empirical research on actual sentencing decisions is also recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Human Services
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14391/ajhs.e3004.1.009
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sentencing Inequality and Social Stratification in Indonesia's 2023 Penal Code

M. Sholehuddin, Teng Junaidi Gunawan
Asian Journal of Human Services
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Sentencing Inequality and Social Stratification in Indonesia's 2023 Penal Code

M. Sholehuddin, Teng Junaidi Gunawan
article en

Abstract

The Indonesia 2023 Penal Code, which entered into force on January 2, 2026, formally adopts the double track sentencing system requiring imprisonment and fine sanctions to function as equal-value alternatives.No prior study has evaluated this code using regional minimum wage data as an economic benchmark.This normative legal study employed statutory and conceptual approaches, applying economic analysis of law to calculate the economic value of maximum imprisonment threats using Indonesia's 2023 regional minimum wage data and comparing these against provisioned fine sanctions.Reference value analysis indicated no consistent proportionality between fine sanction categories and imprisonment lengths across the five penal type categories.Economic analysis indicated that the equivalence relationship varies across sentencing categories and wage conditions: under higher wage assumptions fine values fall below the calculated imprisonment burden across most categories, while under lower wage assumptions fine values in several categories meet or exceed calculated imprisonment values, with the Medium category presenting the most persistent concern.The findings suggest the code does not apply a consistent equivalence principle the double track sentencing system requires, creating structural conditions that may contribute to wealth-based disparities in criminal justice outcomes.These findings reflect codified provisions rather than empirical practice; actual outcomes are subject to judicial discretion, and whether structural patterns translate into disparities will depend on judicial application.Future revisions should incorporate a structured sentencing equivalence framework derived from the regional minimum wage to ensure equitable outcomes regardless of offender economic status.Future empirical research on actual sentencing decisions is also recommended.

Asian Journal of Human ServicesVol. 30(4)
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya (ID), Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya (ID)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.