Artificial-Intelligence-Based Cephalometric Landmark Detection in Lateral Cephalograms

Background/Objectives: Accurate landmark identification underpins reliable cephalometric analysis. This study evaluated a ResNet50-based, single-stage regression convolutional neural network for direct automatic localization of 15 landmarks on lateral cephalograms. Methods: This retrospective study included 669 lateral cephalograms (669 patients): 619 for training and 50 randomly selected for an internal holdout test set. One of five orthodontists annotated each cephalogram, and coordinates served as the reference standard. One orthodontist independently re-annotated all test images after more than 2 weeks to assess reproducibility. Model performance was evaluated using Euclidean localization errors and success detection rates (SDR). Results: Across 750 landmark predictions, mean localization error was 1.25 ± 1.39 mm (95% confidence interval, 1.15–1.35 mm) and median error was 0.72 mm. SDRs within 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mm were 64.5%, 81.5%, and 94.4%, respectively. A statistically significant overall difference was observed among the 15 landmarks (Friedman χ2(14) = 28.84, p = 0.011). Point A had the numerically largest mean error (1.66 mm) and the mandibular central incisor the smallest (1.04 mm). The mean difference between original and repeated annotations was 0.52 ± 0.92 mm. Conclusions: In this single-center internal holdout test set, mean localization error was below the 2.0 mm benchmark. However, 18.5% of predictions exceeded 2.0 mm, and external validity remains unconfirmed. Artificial-intelligence-generated landmarks should be verified by orthodontists, and external validation is required before broader clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15155943
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial-Intelligence-Based Cephalometric Landmark Detection in Lateral Cephalograms

Tetsutaro Yamaguchi, Yoshiki Soeda, Masato Tsutsumi, Yasuhiro Kuroda et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Artificial-Intelligence-Based Cephalometric Landmark Detection in Lateral Cephalograms

Tetsutaro Yamaguchi, Yoshiki Soeda, Masato Tsutsumi, Yasuhiro Kuroda, Manami Yamaguchi
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Accurate landmark identification underpins reliable cephalometric analysis. This study evaluated a ResNet50-based, single-stage regression convolutional neural network for direct automatic localization of 15 landmarks on lateral cephalograms. Methods: This retrospective study included 669 lateral cephalograms (669 patients): 619 for training and 50 randomly selected for an internal holdout test set. One of five orthodontists annotated each cephalogram, and coordinates served as the reference standard. One orthodontist independently re-annotated all test images after more than 2 weeks to assess reproducibility. Model performance was evaluated using Euclidean localization errors and success detection rates (SDR). Results: Across 750 landmark predictions, mean localization error was 1.25 ± 1.39 mm (95% confidence interval, 1.15–1.35 mm) and median error was 0.72 mm. SDRs within 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mm were 64.5%, 81.5%, and 94.4%, respectively. A statistically significant overall difference was observed among the 15 landmarks (Friedman χ2(14) = 28.84, p = 0.011). Point A had the numerically largest mean error (1.66 mm) and the mandibular central incisor the smallest (1.04 mm). The mean difference between original and repeated annotations was 0.52 ± 0.92 mm. Conclusions: In this single-center internal holdout test set, mean localization error was below the 2.0 mm benchmark. However, 18.5% of predictions exceeded 2.0 mm, and external validity remains unconfirmed. Artificial-intelligence-generated landmarks should be verified by orthodontists, and external validation is required before broader clinical use.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(15)
University of Tsukuba (JP), Kanagawa Dental University (JP), Nagoya University (JP)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.