Dimensions of implementation facilitation (IF): development of a tool for designing, documenting and reporting on IF strategies in healthcare settings

Abstract Background Implementation strategies are operationalized variably and often inadequately described in scientific literature, prompting calls for standardized reporting mechanisms. Implementation facilitation (IF) is a complex, multifaceted, and evidence-based implementation strategy that is one of the more frequently applied and evaluated. Identifying and defining the complete range of IF dimensions is foundational to establishing a more standardized approach to designing, documenting, and reporting on IF strategies. Such work will provide greater transparency and understanding of how the strategy is applied, as well as greater consistency in reporting. This paper describes the development of a tool to support such a standardized approach to IF design, documentation, and reporting in healthcare settings. Methods We used a rigorous, multi-phase process to develop and refine a tool to support IF practitioners and researchers in designing, documenting, and reporting on an IF strategy. We validated the tool’s usefulness; verified current reporting of IF dimensions and how they were described in relevant protocol papers; and iteratively refined and enhanced the tool to create the Implementation Facilitation Dimensions Worksheet . Results We identified and defined thirteen IF dimensions, including Position; IF skills, innovation knowledge, and characteristics; Self-efficacy; Activities; Autonomy/degree of flexibility; Duration; Frequency/intensity; Modes of interaction/mediums used; Role/approach; Change agents; Other stakeholders; Sources of influence; and Resources that support the facilitator. The final publicly available tool includes a structured worksheet that can be used to describe the dimensions of a planned or previously applied IF strategy, a table that lists and defines IF activities that can be used in implementation efforts, instructions and examples for operationalizing the IF dimensions, and a list of other related tools and resources. Conclusions The Implementation Facilitation Dimensions Worksheet provides guidance and a structured format intended to support the comprehensive design, documentation, and reporting of IF strategies. If the tool achieves its intended purpose, researchers and implementation practitioners may be better informed and equipped to make comparisons of IF strategies across studies and/or to replicate or spread successful IF strategies to other healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-01056-0
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dimensions of implementation facilitation (IF): development of a tool for designing, documenting and reporting on IF strategies in healthcare settings

Justina H. Hill, Karen A. Oliver, Katherine M. Dollar, Jeffrey L. Smith et al.
Implementation Science Communications
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Dimensions of implementation facilitation (IF): development of a tool for designing, documenting and reporting on IF strategies in healthcare settings

Justina H. Hill, Karen A. Oliver, Katherine M. Dollar, Jeffrey L. Smith, JoAnn E. Kirchner, Mona J. Ritchie, Jeanette A. Waxmonsky
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Implementation strategies are operationalized variably and often inadequately described in scientific literature, prompting calls for standardized reporting mechanisms. Implementation facilitation (IF) is a complex, multifaceted, and evidence-based implementation strategy that is one of the more frequently applied and evaluated. Identifying and defining the complete range of IF dimensions is foundational to establishing a more standardized approach to designing, documenting, and reporting on IF strategies. Such work will provide greater transparency and understanding of how the strategy is applied, as well as greater consistency in reporting. This paper describes the development of a tool to support such a standardized approach to IF design, documentation, and reporting in healthcare settings. Methods We used a rigorous, multi-phase process to develop and refine a tool to support IF practitioners and researchers in designing, documenting, and reporting on an IF strategy. We validated the tool’s usefulness; verified current reporting of IF dimensions and how they were described in relevant protocol papers; and iteratively refined and enhanced the tool to create the Implementation Facilitation Dimensions Worksheet . Results We identified and defined thirteen IF dimensions, including Position; IF skills, innovation knowledge, and characteristics; Self-efficacy; Activities; Autonomy/degree of flexibility; Duration; Frequency/intensity; Modes of interaction/mediums used; Role/approach; Change agents; Other stakeholders; Sources of influence; and Resources that support the facilitator. The final publicly available tool includes a structured worksheet that can be used to describe the dimensions of a planned or previously applied IF strategy, a table that lists and defines IF activities that can be used in implementation efforts, instructions and examples for operationalizing the IF dimensions, and a list of other related tools and resources. Conclusions The Implementation Facilitation Dimensions Worksheet provides guidance and a structured format intended to support the comprehensive design, documentation, and reporting of IF strategies. If the tool achieves its intended purpose, researchers and implementation practitioners may be better informed and equipped to make comparisons of IF strategies across studies and/or to replicate or spread successful IF strategies to other healthcare settings.

Implementation Science Communications
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Colorado School of Public Health (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), Nanostring Technologies (United States) (US), Syracuse VA Medical Center (US), Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (US), University of Colorado Cancer Center (US), IQ Solutions (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.