Real‐world outcomes in patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptor‐negative advanced breast cancer and visceral metastases at baseline – advanced hormone receptor positive breast cancer registry in Austr
BACKGROUND: Hormone receptor-positive, HER2- breast cancer (HR+/HER2-) represents most advanced breast cancer (ABC) cases. Patients with visceral metastases are considered to have aggressive disease, historically treated with first-line chemotherapy (CT). However, trials (RIGHT Choice, PADMA, ABIGAIL) have demonstrated that cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) provide superior efficacy and tolerability in this setting. AIMS: To compare outcomes between first-line CDK4/6i + ET and CT in Australian patients with HR+/HER2- ABC and visceral metastases. METHODS: Data were obtained from the ARORA registry, a prospective observational study capturing real-world outcomes for Australian patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, with visceral metastases diagnosed after 1 January 2020, and received first-line systemic therapy. Participants were stratified by initial treatment: CT, ET + CDK4/6i or ET monotherapy. ET monotherapy was analysed as a separate cohort and excluded from comparative progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. Primary endpoints were (1) OS: time from metastatic diagnosis to death and (2) PFS: time to progression on first-line therapy. RESULTS: A total of 418 patients were included, with a median age of 56 years and median follow-up of 12 months. The majority of patients (73.7%) received first-line CDK4/6i + ET. Compared with CT, CDK4/6i + ET yielded significantly longer PFS (20.0 vs 11.9 months, P = 0.0006). A trend towards improved OS was observed (28.6 vs 22.9 months, P = 0.1399). CONCLUSION: This real-world analysis reinforces CDK4/6i + ET as the preferred first-line treatment for HR+/HER2- ABC with visceral metastases. While selection bias cannot be excluded, these findings support the shift away from routine first-line CT. Ongoing follow-up will clarify the OS impact.
Authors
- Bhaskar Karki
- Louise Nott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8646-1585)
- Iris Tung
- Lucy Gately (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3003-3175)
- Sally Baron-Hay
- Chloe Georgiou
- Vanessa Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-8786)
- Sheau Wen Lok (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9919-1665)
- Sally Greenberg
- Lucas Wigston
- Catherine Morton
- Richard de Boer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6986-2010)
- Peter Gibbs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5754-7352)
- Kelly Mok
- Javier Torres
- E Jude (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5994-4547)
- Michelle Nottage
- Ian M. Collins
- Natalie Rainey
- Katharine Cuff
- Ali Morris
- Frances Boyle
Institutions
- Goulburn Valley Health (AU)
- Mater Health Services (AU)
- Flinders University (AU)
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU)
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
- Toowoomba Hospital (AU)
- Liverpool Hospital (AU)
- Cairns Hospital (AU)
- Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
- Cancer Institute of New South Wales (AU)
- Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
- Eastern Health (AU)
- St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney (AU)
- Ballarat Health Services (AU)
- Western Health (AU)
- Northern Cancer Institute (AU)
- Bendigo Health (AU)
- Cancer Care Services (US)
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre (AU)
- Alfred Health (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Internal Medicine Journal
- Published
- 2026-07-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70544
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00