Real‐world outcomes in patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptor‐negative advanced breast cancer and visceral metastases at baseline – advanced hormone receptor positive breast cancer registry in Austr

BACKGROUND: Hormone receptor-positive, HER2- breast cancer (HR+/HER2-) represents most advanced breast cancer (ABC) cases. Patients with visceral metastases are considered to have aggressive disease, historically treated with first-line chemotherapy (CT). However, trials (RIGHT Choice, PADMA, ABIGAIL) have demonstrated that cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) provide superior efficacy and tolerability in this setting. AIMS: To compare outcomes between first-line CDK4/6i + ET and CT in Australian patients with HR+/HER2- ABC and visceral metastases. METHODS: Data were obtained from the ARORA registry, a prospective observational study capturing real-world outcomes for Australian patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, with visceral metastases diagnosed after 1 January 2020, and received first-line systemic therapy. Participants were stratified by initial treatment: CT, ET + CDK4/6i or ET monotherapy. ET monotherapy was analysed as a separate cohort and excluded from comparative progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. Primary endpoints were (1) OS: time from metastatic diagnosis to death and (2) PFS: time to progression on first-line therapy. RESULTS: A total of 418 patients were included, with a median age of 56 years and median follow-up of 12 months. The majority of patients (73.7%) received first-line CDK4/6i + ET. Compared with CT, CDK4/6i + ET yielded significantly longer PFS (20.0 vs 11.9 months, P = 0.0006). A trend towards improved OS was observed (28.6 vs 22.9 months, P = 0.1399). CONCLUSION: This real-world analysis reinforces CDK4/6i + ET as the preferred first-line treatment for HR+/HER2- ABC with visceral metastases. While selection bias cannot be excluded, these findings support the shift away from routine first-line CT. Ongoing follow-up will clarify the OS impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Internal Medicine Journal
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70544
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real‐world outcomes in patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptor‐negative advanced breast cancer and visceral metastases at baseline – advanced hormone receptor positive breast cancer registry in Austr

Bhaskar Karki, Louise Nott, Iris Tung, Lucy Gately et al.
Internal Medicine Journal
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Real‐world outcomes in patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptor‐negative advanced breast cancer and visceral metastases at baseline – advanced hormone receptor positive breast cancer registry in Austr

Bhaskar Karki, Louise Nott, Iris Tung, Lucy Gately, Sally Baron-Hay, Chloe Georgiou, Vanessa Wong, Sheau Wen Lok, Sally Greenberg, Lucas Wigston, Catherine Morton, Richard de Boer, Peter Gibbs, Kelly Mok, Javier Torres, E Jude, Michelle Nottage, Ian M. Collins, Natalie Rainey, Katharine Cuff, Ali Morris, Frances Boyle
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hormone receptor-positive, HER2- breast cancer (HR+/HER2-) represents most advanced breast cancer (ABC) cases. Patients with visceral metastases are considered to have aggressive disease, historically treated with first-line chemotherapy (CT). However, trials (RIGHT Choice, PADMA, ABIGAIL) have demonstrated that cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) provide superior efficacy and tolerability in this setting. AIMS: To compare outcomes between first-line CDK4/6i + ET and CT in Australian patients with HR+/HER2- ABC and visceral metastases. METHODS: Data were obtained from the ARORA registry, a prospective observational study capturing real-world outcomes for Australian patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, with visceral metastases diagnosed after 1 January 2020, and received first-line systemic therapy. Participants were stratified by initial treatment: CT, ET + CDK4/6i or ET monotherapy. ET monotherapy was analysed as a separate cohort and excluded from comparative progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. Primary endpoints were (1) OS: time from metastatic diagnosis to death and (2) PFS: time to progression on first-line therapy. RESULTS: A total of 418 patients were included, with a median age of 56 years and median follow-up of 12 months. The majority of patients (73.7%) received first-line CDK4/6i + ET. Compared with CT, CDK4/6i + ET yielded significantly longer PFS (20.0 vs 11.9 months, P = 0.0006). A trend towards improved OS was observed (28.6 vs 22.9 months, P = 0.1399). CONCLUSION: This real-world analysis reinforces CDK4/6i + ET as the preferred first-line treatment for HR+/HER2- ABC with visceral metastases. While selection bias cannot be excluded, these findings support the shift away from routine first-line CT. Ongoing follow-up will clarify the OS impact.

Internal Medicine Journal
Goulburn Valley Health (AU), Mater Health Services (AU), Flinders University (AU), Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Toowoomba Hospital (AU), Liverpool Hospital (AU), Cairns Hospital (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Cancer Institute of New South Wales (AU), Royal Hobart Hospital (AU), Eastern Health (AU), St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney (AU), Ballarat Health Services (AU), Western Health (AU), Northern Cancer Institute (AU), Bendigo Health (AU), Cancer Care Services (US), Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre (AU), Alfred Health (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.