Prompting for Pragmatics: Improving the Cultural Sensitivity of LLM Translations for Business Emails

Abstract Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly diffusing into multilingual workplaces, where managers and employees rely on them to translate everyday communication. While LLMs can now generate translations with high lexical accuracy, it remains unclear whether they can produce translations that are culturally appropriate for the target audience—an issue central to collaboration in multinational corporations. We analyze the cultural sensitivity of English-to-Japanese LLM translations of workplace emails across three prompting strategies: (1) naïve “just translate” prompts, (2) audience-targeted prompts specifying the recipient’s cultural background and workplace role, and (3) instructional prompts providing explicit guidance on Japanese communication norms. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, Study 1 applies a cross-cultural pragmatics scheme to compare culture-specific language patterns in source texts and translations; Study 2 asks Japanese native speakers to evaluate each translation for perceived appropriateness and intention to comply. We find that naïve prompts yield only limited adaptation toward Japanese language patterns. Audience-targeted prompts produce meaningful improvements, and instructional prompts generate the strongest textual adaptation. However, recipient evaluations reveal a threshold effect: although both culturally informed prompts significantly outperform the naïve baseline, instructional prompts do not produce significantly higher appropriateness or compliance ratings than audience-targeted prompts. Theoretically, we advance language-sensitive international management research by applying cross-cultural pragmatics to LLM-mediated workplace translation and by providing a replicable way to assess the cultural sensitivity of translated workplace communication through both pragmatic adaptation of language patterns and recipient evaluations. We also theorize LLMs as new translating agents in multilingual MNC communication. Practically, our findings show that lightweight audience-targeted prompting can already yield meaningful improvements in the cultural sensitivity of LLM translations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management International Review
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-026-00637-4
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prompting for Pragmatics: Improving the Cultural Sensitivity of LLM Translations for Business Emails

Helene Tenzer, Oumnia Abidi, Stefan Feuerriegel
Management International Review
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Prompting for Pragmatics: Improving the Cultural Sensitivity of LLM Translations for Business Emails

Helene Tenzer, Oumnia Abidi, Stefan Feuerriegel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly diffusing into multilingual workplaces, where managers and employees rely on them to translate everyday communication. While LLMs can now generate translations with high lexical accuracy, it remains unclear whether they can produce translations that are culturally appropriate for the target audience—an issue central to collaboration in multinational corporations. We analyze the cultural sensitivity of English-to-Japanese LLM translations of workplace emails across three prompting strategies: (1) naïve “just translate” prompts, (2) audience-targeted prompts specifying the recipient’s cultural background and workplace role, and (3) instructional prompts providing explicit guidance on Japanese communication norms. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, Study 1 applies a cross-cultural pragmatics scheme to compare culture-specific language patterns in source texts and translations; Study 2 asks Japanese native speakers to evaluate each translation for perceived appropriateness and intention to comply. We find that naïve prompts yield only limited adaptation toward Japanese language patterns. Audience-targeted prompts produce meaningful improvements, and instructional prompts generate the strongest textual adaptation. However, recipient evaluations reveal a threshold effect: although both culturally informed prompts significantly outperform the naïve baseline, instructional prompts do not produce significantly higher appropriateness or compliance ratings than audience-targeted prompts. Theoretically, we advance language-sensitive international management research by applying cross-cultural pragmatics to LLM-mediated workplace translation and by providing a replicable way to assess the cultural sensitivity of translated workplace communication through both pragmatic adaptation of language patterns and recipient evaluations. We also theorize LLMs as new translating agents in multilingual MNC communication. Practically, our findings show that lightweight audience-targeted prompting can already yield meaningful improvements in the cultural sensitivity of LLM translations.

Management International Review
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Toulouse-I-Capitole (FR), Toulouse School of Economics (FR), Munich Center for Machine Learning, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.