Breast and Ovarian Cancer Among Individuals Undergoing <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> Testing

Importance: Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer substantial risks of breast and ovarian cancer; however, risk for female individuals undergoing testing, particularly those with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) or negative results, remain poorly defined. Objective: To estimate lifetime incidence of breast and ovarian cancer among female individuals undergoing BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing across all result categories and evaluate the modifying association of family history. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted as part of the What Comes Next Cohort Study, a near-population-based cohort in Ontario, Canada, established through linkage with administrative databases. Female participants who underwent BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing from 2007 to 2016 were matched 1:5 to females from the general population. Participants were followed up to September 2024. Data were analyzed from May to December 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome of interest was the cumulative incidence of breast and ovarian cancer to age 80 years, stratified by genetic test result and family history. Results: Of 15 986 individuals in the What Comes Next Cohort Study cohort, 6966 individuals eligible for breast cancer analyses (median [IQR] age, 49 [38-60] years) were matched to 34 830 individuals from the general population and 13 276 individuals eligible for ovarian cancer analyses (median [IQR] age, 51 [41-61] years) were matched to 66 380 individuals from the general population. Cumulative breast cancer incidence to age 80 years was 62.1% (95% CI, 52.2%-69.9%) for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 66.1% (95% CI, 57.5%-72.9%) for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, compared with 12.0% (95% CI, 11.2%-12.8%) in the general population; corresponding ovarian cancer incidence was 56.0% (95% CI, 40.0%-67.7%) for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 29.3% (95% CI, 14.2%-41.7%) for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, compared with 1.5% (95% CI, 1.3%-1.7%) in the general population. Family history modified breast cancer risk, reaching a cumulative incidence of 86.3% (95% CI, 70.9%-93.5%) in carriers with at least 2 affected first-degree relatives vs 55.8% (95% CI, 45.4%-64.2%) in carriers without a family history of breast cancer. Among individuals with test results positive for pathogenic variants, lifetime risk of ovarian cancer was similarly modified by family history, reaching 64.2% (95% CI, 37.0%-79.7%) in those with vs 38.2% (95% CI, 25.8%-48.4%) in those without a family history of ovarian cancer. Individuals with VUS and negative test results also had increased lifetime breast cancer risks (31.2% [95% CI, 19.2%-41.4%] and 26.3% [95% CI, 23.0%-29.4%], respectively) but no increase in ovarian cancer risk. Individuals with test results negative for a known familial variant had risks similar to the general population. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of females who underwent BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing, the lifetime cancer risk varied substantially across BRCA test result groups and was further modified by family history. Elevated breast cancer risk among individuals with VUS or negative results highlights the need for individualized risk assessment and management beyond genetic test results alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.26334
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast and Ovarian Cancer Among Individuals Undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing

Zharmaine Ante, Fahima Dossa, Kelly Metcalfe, Nancy N. Baxter et al.
JAMA Network Open
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Breast and Ovarian Cancer Among Individuals Undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing

Zharmaine Ante, Fahima Dossa, Kelly Metcalfe, Nancy N. Baxter, Ning Liu, Andrea Eisen, Jordan Lerner-Ellis
article en

Abstract

Importance: Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer substantial risks of breast and ovarian cancer; however, risk for female individuals undergoing testing, particularly those with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) or negative results, remain poorly defined. Objective: To estimate lifetime incidence of breast and ovarian cancer among female individuals undergoing BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing across all result categories and evaluate the modifying association of family history. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted as part of the What Comes Next Cohort Study, a near-population-based cohort in Ontario, Canada, established through linkage with administrative databases. Female participants who underwent BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing from 2007 to 2016 were matched 1:5 to females from the general population. Participants were followed up to September 2024. Data were analyzed from May to December 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome of interest was the cumulative incidence of breast and ovarian cancer to age 80 years, stratified by genetic test result and family history. Results: Of 15 986 individuals in the What Comes Next Cohort Study cohort, 6966 individuals eligible for breast cancer analyses (median [IQR] age, 49 [38-60] years) were matched to 34 830 individuals from the general population and 13 276 individuals eligible for ovarian cancer analyses (median [IQR] age, 51 [41-61] years) were matched to 66 380 individuals from the general population. Cumulative breast cancer incidence to age 80 years was 62.1% (95% CI, 52.2%-69.9%) for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 66.1% (95% CI, 57.5%-72.9%) for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, compared with 12.0% (95% CI, 11.2%-12.8%) in the general population; corresponding ovarian cancer incidence was 56.0% (95% CI, 40.0%-67.7%) for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 29.3% (95% CI, 14.2%-41.7%) for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, compared with 1.5% (95% CI, 1.3%-1.7%) in the general population. Family history modified breast cancer risk, reaching a cumulative incidence of 86.3% (95% CI, 70.9%-93.5%) in carriers with at least 2 affected first-degree relatives vs 55.8% (95% CI, 45.4%-64.2%) in carriers without a family history of breast cancer. Among individuals with test results positive for pathogenic variants, lifetime risk of ovarian cancer was similarly modified by family history, reaching 64.2% (95% CI, 37.0%-79.7%) in those with vs 38.2% (95% CI, 25.8%-48.4%) in those without a family history of ovarian cancer. Individuals with VUS and negative test results also had increased lifetime breast cancer risks (31.2% [95% CI, 19.2%-41.4%] and 26.3% [95% CI, 23.0%-29.4%], respectively) but no increase in ovarian cancer risk. Individuals with test results negative for a known familial variant had risks similar to the general population. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of females who underwent BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing, the lifetime cancer risk varied substantially across BRCA test result groups and was further modified by family history. Elevated breast cancer risk among individuals with VUS or negative results highlights the need for individualized risk assessment and management beyond genetic test results alone.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(7)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (CA), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Toronto (CA), Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute (CA), Juravinski Cancer Centre (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), Sinai Health System (CA), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.