Negative interpretation bias and emotional responses to positive contexts

Negative interpretation bias, the tendency to interpret ambiguous situations as negative or threatening, is associated with reports of intense and more frequent negative affect. However, there is a relative paucity of work seeking to determine whether this cognitive bias might account for individual differences in affective responses to positive content. Given the wealth of benefits associated with positive emotional experiences, such as greater psychological wellbeing and better physical health, this investigation tested the influence of negative interpretation bias on emotion responses to evocative positive film clips as positive emotion-eliciting contexts. Negative interpretation bias was indexed using a novel word matching task. In each investigation, careful consideration of dispositional or trait-level influence on interpretation bias (i.e., dispositional negativity) was considered. Investigations conducted across three samples of college students at a large, Midwestern public university reveal complexity to this question: in one study, a small significant indirect effect of negative interpretation bias on the association between dispositional negativity and self-reported affect following positive emotionally-evocative films was found, while in the two subsequent studies, no significant mediation was found. Certain contextual factors, such as the explicit or discrete nature of the clip presentation as well as more stable tendencies toward positive emotional responsivity and the capacity to self-report emotional experiences, appear to be important. Finally, the novel task was found to be reliable and demonstrated convergent validity with established indicators. Future work should continue to clarify the conditions under which negative interpretation bias may influence responses to positive emotional contexts, given the importance of positive emotionality for lifelong physical and mental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353912
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative interpretation bias and emotional responses to positive contexts

Karin G. Coifman, Emily Gawlik
PLoS ONE
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Negative interpretation bias and emotional responses to positive contexts

Karin G. Coifman, Emily Gawlik
article en

Abstract

Negative interpretation bias, the tendency to interpret ambiguous situations as negative or threatening, is associated with reports of intense and more frequent negative affect. However, there is a relative paucity of work seeking to determine whether this cognitive bias might account for individual differences in affective responses to positive content. Given the wealth of benefits associated with positive emotional experiences, such as greater psychological wellbeing and better physical health, this investigation tested the influence of negative interpretation bias on emotion responses to evocative positive film clips as positive emotion-eliciting contexts. Negative interpretation bias was indexed using a novel word matching task. In each investigation, careful consideration of dispositional or trait-level influence on interpretation bias (i.e., dispositional negativity) was considered. Investigations conducted across three samples of college students at a large, Midwestern public university reveal complexity to this question: in one study, a small significant indirect effect of negative interpretation bias on the association between dispositional negativity and self-reported affect following positive emotionally-evocative films was found, while in the two subsequent studies, no significant mediation was found. Certain contextual factors, such as the explicit or discrete nature of the clip presentation as well as more stable tendencies toward positive emotional responsivity and the capacity to self-report emotional experiences, appear to be important. Finally, the novel task was found to be reliable and demonstrated convergent validity with established indicators. Future work should continue to clarify the conditions under which negative interpretation bias may influence responses to positive emotional contexts, given the importance of positive emotionality for lifelong physical and mental health.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Kent State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.