Plains zebra (Equus quagga) group movement decisions are associated with visual and tactile behaviours performed by initiators, followers and non-followers

Abstract Diverging needs often occurs among group members, prompting group-living animals to engage in collective decision-making, such as coordinating collective movement. Existing models classify these decision-making processes as unshared (despotic), shared (democratic), or partially shared (partially democratic). However, how specific communication contribute to different decision-making outcomes remains unclear. Here, we investigated the decision-making process underlying collective movement departure in South African plains zebras, focusing on visual, tactile and acoustic behaviours emitted by individuals playing various roles – initiators, followers, and non-followers. Our findings revealed that zebras use non-acoustic behaviours (i.e. visual and tactile) to make decisions about when to move as a group; namely, headshakes, head-bobs, contacts, grazing, standing, short walks, and direction changes were significantly associated with the decision-making process. Conversely, we did not detect an association between acoustic behaviours and collective movement departure. Our findings also suggest that zebras display role-differentiated behaviours associated with departure outcomes that are consistent with a partially shared-decision-making process, as the behaviours of not only initiators but also followers and non-followers were related to the decision-making process for group movement. Specifically, our analyses showed that the number of followers versus non-followers in a group movement decreased as the time non-followers spent standing before departure increased, while an increased rate of direction change of both initiators and non-followers was associated with shorter group movement duration. In conclusion, our study suggests that collective movement departure in zebras may arise from a partially shared decision-making process based mostly on non-acoustic behaviours. This research contributes valuable insights into the behavioural intricacies of group-living animals, laying the groundwork for further comprehension of social dynamics and collective decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-026-03783-9
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plains zebra (Equus quagga) group movement decisions are associated with visual and tactile behaviours performed by initiators, followers and non-followers

Cédric Sueur, Bing Xie, Elodie F. Briefer
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

Plains zebra (Equus quagga) group movement decisions are associated with visual and tactile behaviours performed by initiators, followers and non-followers

Cédric Sueur, Bing Xie, Elodie F. Briefer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Diverging needs often occurs among group members, prompting group-living animals to engage in collective decision-making, such as coordinating collective movement. Existing models classify these decision-making processes as unshared (despotic), shared (democratic), or partially shared (partially democratic). However, how specific communication contribute to different decision-making outcomes remains unclear. Here, we investigated the decision-making process underlying collective movement departure in South African plains zebras, focusing on visual, tactile and acoustic behaviours emitted by individuals playing various roles – initiators, followers, and non-followers. Our findings revealed that zebras use non-acoustic behaviours (i.e. visual and tactile) to make decisions about when to move as a group; namely, headshakes, head-bobs, contacts, grazing, standing, short walks, and direction changes were significantly associated with the decision-making process. Conversely, we did not detect an association between acoustic behaviours and collective movement departure. Our findings also suggest that zebras display role-differentiated behaviours associated with departure outcomes that are consistent with a partially shared-decision-making process, as the behaviours of not only initiators but also followers and non-followers were related to the decision-making process for group movement. Specifically, our analyses showed that the number of followers versus non-followers in a group movement decreased as the time non-followers spent standing before departure increased, while an increased rate of direction change of both initiators and non-followers was associated with shorter group movement duration. In conclusion, our study suggests that collective movement departure in zebras may arise from a partially shared decision-making process based mostly on non-acoustic behaviours. This research contributes valuable insights into the behavioural intricacies of group-living animals, laying the groundwork for further comprehension of social dynamics and collective decision-making processes.

Behavioral Ecology and SociobiologyVol. 80(8)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Copenhagen Zoo (DK), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Københavns Universitet
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.