Executive Privilege in the States: Judicial Construction, Gubernatorial Power, and Transparency

This article examines the emergence of gubernatorial communications privilege in the American states, an underexplored form of executive power that bears directly on transparency and democratic accountability. Drawing on gubernatorial communications privilege claims and state court decisions, the analysis shows that formal judicial recognition is rare, appearing in only eleven states, and does not map neatly onto conventional political or institutional explanations such as divided government or gubernatorial strength. Instead, the study advances a judicial entrepreneurship framework arguing that state courts, as opposed to governors, initially served as the primary architects of executive privilege by introducing and legitimizing the doctrine in the absence of sustained executive action. The findings recast executive privilege in the states as a judicially constructed and weakly institutionalized power with important implications for the balance between transparency and executive authority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
State and Local Government Review
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x261475550
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Executive Privilege in the States: Judicial Construction, Gubernatorial Power, and Transparency

Mitchel Sollenberger
State and Local Government Review
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Executive Privilege in the States: Judicial Construction, Gubernatorial Power, and Transparency

Mitchel Sollenberger
article en

Abstract

This article examines the emergence of gubernatorial communications privilege in the American states, an underexplored form of executive power that bears directly on transparency and democratic accountability. Drawing on gubernatorial communications privilege claims and state court decisions, the analysis shows that formal judicial recognition is rare, appearing in only eleven states, and does not map neatly onto conventional political or institutional explanations such as divided government or gubernatorial strength. Instead, the study advances a judicial entrepreneurship framework arguing that state courts, as opposed to governors, initially served as the primary architects of executive privilege by introducing and legitimizing the doctrine in the absence of sustained executive action. The findings recast executive privilege in the states as a judicially constructed and weakly institutionalized power with important implications for the balance between transparency and executive authority.

State and Local Government Review
University of Michigan–Dearborn (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.