Governing aging through learning: later-life education policy in China, 1982–2025

As population aging accelerates, later-life education has become an increasingly visible policy response across aging societies. However, it is still more often understood as a welfare service or participatory good than as a political technology through which aging is governed. Drawing on Foucauldian discourse analysis, this article examines how national later-life education policy in China from 1982 to 2025 renders later life governable through learning. The analysis shows, first, that later-life education has developed from a selective arrangement for retired veteran cadres into a dispersed governance technology embedded in aging strategy, community infrastructures and society-wide aging education. Second, education is justified through the problematization of aging as a developmental pressure, a burden on elderly care systems and a risk to social stability. Third, these governing technologies are translated into five educational tracks: health, vocational, digital, volunteer and ideological education, through which policy promotes a desirable older subject who is independent, responsible, adaptable and politically aligned. While policy expands learning participation, it simultaneously recodes structural inequalities as individual deficits, rendering some older adults less visible and less supportable within the policy field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Policy Studies
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2026.2709140
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing aging through learning: later-life education policy in China, 1982–2025

Por Heong Hong, Dai Jinglin
Critical Policy Studies
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

Governing aging through learning: later-life education policy in China, 1982–2025

Por Heong Hong, Dai Jinglin
article en

Abstract

As population aging accelerates, later-life education has become an increasingly visible policy response across aging societies. However, it is still more often understood as a welfare service or participatory good than as a political technology through which aging is governed. Drawing on Foucauldian discourse analysis, this article examines how national later-life education policy in China from 1982 to 2025 renders later life governable through learning. The analysis shows, first, that later-life education has developed from a selective arrangement for retired veteran cadres into a dispersed governance technology embedded in aging strategy, community infrastructures and society-wide aging education. Second, education is justified through the problematization of aging as a developmental pressure, a burden on elderly care systems and a risk to social stability. Third, these governing technologies are translated into five educational tracks: health, vocational, digital, volunteer and ideological education, through which policy promotes a desirable older subject who is independent, responsible, adaptable and politically aligned. While policy expands learning participation, it simultaneously recodes structural inequalities as individual deficits, rendering some older adults less visible and less supportable within the policy field.

Critical Policy Studies
Lanzhou Jiaotong University (CN), Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.