Human–Agent Attribution Discontinuity: A Forensic and Assurance Methodology, Version 0.5

Human–Agent Attribution Discontinuity (HAAD) is a forensic and assurance methodology for determining how far available evidence supports attribution of a consequential AI-agent action to a natural person. It separates attribution into proposition-level dimensions, including identity, control, interaction authorship, authorization, voluntariness, scope, knowledge, intent, and causation, and identifies where the evidentiary chain becomes discontinuous. Version 0.5 provides the canonical methodology, an executive overview, practitioner workpapers, and ten structured-scenario pilot evidence packs. It retains the canonical fourteen-dimension register and adds controls for MCP-mediated actions, organizational attribution paths, campaign and activity-share analysis, decision-state and outcome-stage separation, cross-run persistence, effective-target comparison, and independent review. As of August 25, 2026, no independent-practitioner data exist for any HAAD version. The testing programme remains planned. Version 0.5 is not presented as a validated standard, forensic doctrine, legal attribution framework, or generally reliable method for real-world casework. The controlled pilot reference model and agreement instrument are excluded from this public release to preserve future testing integrity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21683275
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human–Agent Attribution Discontinuity: A Forensic and Assurance Methodology, Version 0.5

Kevin V. Watson
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Human–Agent Attribution Discontinuity: A Forensic and Assurance Methodology, Version 0.5

Kevin V. Watson
article en

Abstract

Human–Agent Attribution Discontinuity (HAAD) is a forensic and assurance methodology for determining how far available evidence supports attribution of a consequential AI-agent action to a natural person. It separates attribution into proposition-level dimensions, including identity, control, interaction authorship, authorization, voluntariness, scope, knowledge, intent, and causation, and identifies where the evidentiary chain becomes discontinuous. Version 0.5 provides the canonical methodology, an executive overview, practitioner workpapers, and ten structured-scenario pilot evidence packs. It retains the canonical fourteen-dimension register and adds controls for MCP-mediated actions, organizational attribution paths, campaign and activity-share analysis, decision-state and outcome-stage separation, cross-run persistence, effective-target comparison, and independent review. As of August 25, 2026, no independent-practitioner data exist for any HAAD version. The testing programme remains planned. Version 0.5 is not presented as a validated standard, forensic doctrine, legal attribution framework, or generally reliable method for real-world casework. The controlled pilot reference model and agreement instrument are excluded from this public release to preserve future testing integrity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.