Exploring the hidden labor of historically excluded students in design education

This study presents findings from in-depth interviews with 13 students from historically excluded backgrounds studying design at a predominantly white university in the United States. The interviews revealed a covert dimension of labor—physical, financial, and emotional—that students from historically excluded backgrounds must navigate alongside the rigorous demands of design school. Using a qualitative interview methodology, the study foregrounds the unique, intersectional perspectives of students often generalized in broader discourse. Four core concepts emerged: a sense of separateness from the culture of design, challenges associated with family support, mistreatment in studio environments, and exhibited coping strategies. The behaviors cannot be understood solely through psychological or interpersonal understandings. Instead, they must be viewed through the specific power dynamics of the design studio, informed by the legacy of colonialism and Western-centric design epistemologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Designing
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30497671261472925
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the hidden labor of historically excluded students in design education

Kristin Alicia Bartlett, Ning Lun, Aanya Chugh, Lucas De Lima
Designing
Design Education and Practice
article

Exploring the hidden labor of historically excluded students in design education

Kristin Alicia Bartlett, Ning Lun, Aanya Chugh, Lucas De Lima
article en

Abstract

This study presents findings from in-depth interviews with 13 students from historically excluded backgrounds studying design at a predominantly white university in the United States. The interviews revealed a covert dimension of labor—physical, financial, and emotional—that students from historically excluded backgrounds must navigate alongside the rigorous demands of design school. Using a qualitative interview methodology, the study foregrounds the unique, intersectional perspectives of students often generalized in broader discourse. Four core concepts emerged: a sense of separateness from the culture of design, challenges associated with family support, mistreatment in studio environments, and exhibited coping strategies. The behaviors cannot be understood solely through psychological or interpersonal understandings. Instead, they must be viewed through the specific power dynamics of the design studio, informed by the legacy of colonialism and Western-centric design epistemologies.

Designing
University of Kentucky (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.