E-Scooter and Bicycle Healthcare Utilization in U.S. Emergency Departments: Examined Through Mode-Specific Diagnostic Codes

Few national comparisons exist on healthcare utilization among e-scooter users, and prior research was limited by the absence of e-scooter-specific ICD-10-CM codes before 2021. Using newly implemented codes, this cross-sectional study compared emergency department disposition and injury patterns between e-scooter riders and bicyclists using the 2021 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (n = 239,457 weighted encounters). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographic, geographic, and temporal confounders, with interaction terms for insurance status, substance use, and motor vehicle involvement. E-scooter riders were more often female (46.5% vs. 24.7%) and under age 18 (47.6% vs. 37.4%) than bicyclists. Overall adjusted odds of admission or transfer did not differ significantly between groups (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.86–1.23). Motor vehicle involvement significantly modified this relationship, with e-scooter riders showing higher odds of admission (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.12–2.48). No significant effect modification was detected for insurance status or substance use. E-scooter riders more frequently sustained distal extremity fractures consistent with low-energy falls, while bicyclists experienced more proximal fractures and internal trauma. Updated ICD-10-CM codes improve e-scooter injury surveillance, and motor vehicle involvement represents a priority target for mode-specific prevention and infrastructure investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23080972
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

E-Scooter and Bicycle Healthcare Utilization in U.S. Emergency Departments: Examined Through Mode-Specific Diagnostic Codes

Jason L. Salemi, Karen D. Liller, Jason Jackman, Leomar White et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

E-Scooter and Bicycle Healthcare Utilization in U.S. Emergency Departments: Examined Through Mode-Specific Diagnostic Codes

Jason L. Salemi, Karen D. Liller, Jason Jackman, Leomar White, Christiana Zimmer
article en

Abstract

Few national comparisons exist on healthcare utilization among e-scooter users, and prior research was limited by the absence of e-scooter-specific ICD-10-CM codes before 2021. Using newly implemented codes, this cross-sectional study compared emergency department disposition and injury patterns between e-scooter riders and bicyclists using the 2021 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (n = 239,457 weighted encounters). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographic, geographic, and temporal confounders, with interaction terms for insurance status, substance use, and motor vehicle involvement. E-scooter riders were more often female (46.5% vs. 24.7%) and under age 18 (47.6% vs. 37.4%) than bicyclists. Overall adjusted odds of admission or transfer did not differ significantly between groups (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.86–1.23). Motor vehicle involvement significantly modified this relationship, with e-scooter riders showing higher odds of admission (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.12–2.48). No significant effect modification was detected for insurance status or substance use. E-scooter riders more frequently sustained distal extremity fractures consistent with low-energy falls, while bicyclists experienced more proximal fractures and internal trauma. Updated ICD-10-CM codes improve e-scooter injury surveillance, and motor vehicle involvement represents a priority target for mode-specific prevention and infrastructure investment.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 23(8)
University of South Florida (US), University of Tampa (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.