ALS Pulse Density Effects on Tree Height Accuracy and the Quality of Elevation and Canopy Rasters

This study investigated the influence of airborne laser scanning (ALS) pulse density on the accuracy of total tree height estimates and the quality of raster products commonly used in individual tree detection (ITD) workflows. Using a high-density (36 pulses per square meter (PPM)) ALS dataset, we generated lower-density subsets and compared derived outputs using a standardized processing pipeline. Tree height estimates were validated against field measurements, and elevation products—digital elevation models (DEMs), digital surface models (DSMs), and canopy height models (CHMs)—were assessed across pulse densities. DSM and CHM quality improved with increasing density, showing reduced bias and tighter variation. In contrast, DEM accuracy remained relatively stable across densities, indicating lower-density ALS may suffice for ground modeling in forested environments. The results also revealed a strong positive relationship between pulse density and total tree height accuracy. Higher-density datasets consistently produced more accurate and less biased tree height estimates, while sparser datasets exhibited systematic underestimation due to missed canopy peaks. These findings emphasize the importance of aligning ALS pulse density with project objectives. While low-density data may be adequate for terrain modeling, higher-density acquisitions are critical for reliable canopy representation and accurate ITD outputs. This study provides operational guidance for forestry practitioners and highlights the value of investing in higher-resolution ALS data for modern forest inventories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f17080878
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ALS Pulse Density Effects on Tree Height Accuracy and the Quality of Elevation and Canopy Rasters

Mark V. Corrao, Dan Kluskiewicz, Joel Glaze, Logan Wimme
Forests
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

ALS Pulse Density Effects on Tree Height Accuracy and the Quality of Elevation and Canopy Rasters

Mark V. Corrao, Dan Kluskiewicz, Joel Glaze, Logan Wimme
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of airborne laser scanning (ALS) pulse density on the accuracy of total tree height estimates and the quality of raster products commonly used in individual tree detection (ITD) workflows. Using a high-density (36 pulses per square meter (PPM)) ALS dataset, we generated lower-density subsets and compared derived outputs using a standardized processing pipeline. Tree height estimates were validated against field measurements, and elevation products—digital elevation models (DEMs), digital surface models (DSMs), and canopy height models (CHMs)—were assessed across pulse densities. DSM and CHM quality improved with increasing density, showing reduced bias and tighter variation. In contrast, DEM accuracy remained relatively stable across densities, indicating lower-density ALS may suffice for ground modeling in forested environments. The results also revealed a strong positive relationship between pulse density and total tree height accuracy. Higher-density datasets consistently produced more accurate and less biased tree height estimates, while sparser datasets exhibited systematic underestimation due to missed canopy peaks. These findings emphasize the importance of aligning ALS pulse density with project objectives. While low-density data may be adequate for terrain modeling, higher-density acquisitions are critical for reliable canopy representation and accurate ITD outputs. This study provides operational guidance for forestry practitioners and highlights the value of investing in higher-resolution ALS data for modern forest inventories.

ForestsVol. 17(8)
University of Idaho (US), ExxonMobil (United States) (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.