Development and validation of a photogrammetry-based preoperative method (BREAST-E) for quantitative breast morphometric analysis and volume estimation of breast in reconstructive surgery

Background The demand for reproducible, reliable, and cost-effective tools regarding preoperative breast surgery planning is significant in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to limited advanced imaging access, insufficient standardisation, and high cost. This study developed the BREAST-E technique for accurate and standardised breast volume analysis. Methodology A photogrammetry method assessed four ptosis levels: (i) no-ptosis, (ii) mild, [Watterson PA, et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1995;95:1185–94] moderate, and (iv) severe. Key parameters included marker counts (20, 40, and 60), photo angles (10°, 20°, and 30°), and offset adjustments (−0.01, 0, and +0.01). Two-dimensional (2D) images were converted into 3D models via Photomodeler for volume estimation. Clinical validation involved 12 patients (13 breasts) undergoing mastectomy, comparing estimated breast volumes to mastectomy specimens. The primary endpoint was accuracy of volume estimation compared with mastectomy specimen volume, while secondary endpoints included reliability, agreement, and workflow feasibility. Results The BREAST-E technique yielded promising accuracy [Pearson correlation coefficient ( R ) = 0.899 and mean absolute error (MAE) = 98.12 mL] and encouraging reliability (ICC = 0.995–0.996) across ptosis levels. Bland-Altman analysis indicated negligible bias, while Cronbach’s alpha (reaching 0.994) demonstrated robust internal consistency. Clinical validation also implied strong performance ( R = 0.789, MAE = 104.69 mL, and mean error = −27.00 mL). Consequently, no-ptosis presented the highest reliability (ICC = 0.81 and Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92) with minimal bias, whereas moderate and severe ptosis levels demonstrated greater variability. Conclusion This study successfully indicated that a reproducible, accessible, and cost-effective method for analysing breast volume was accomplished through the proposed BREAST-E technique for LMICs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353970
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a photogrammetry-based preoperative method (BREAST-E) for quantitative breast morphometric analysis and volume estimation of breast in reconstructive surgery

Kwan Hoong Ng, Jing Hui Ng, Lai-Kuan Wong, Mee‐Hoong See et al.
PLoS ONE
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Development and validation of a photogrammetry-based preoperative method (BREAST-E) for quantitative breast morphometric analysis and volume estimation of breast in reconstructive surgery

Kwan Hoong Ng, Jing Hui Ng, Lai-Kuan Wong, Mee‐Hoong See, Teng Aik Ong, Mahmoud Danaee, Lee Lee Lai, Sheng Pu Teo, Jia Min Tneoh
article en

Abstract

Background The demand for reproducible, reliable, and cost-effective tools regarding preoperative breast surgery planning is significant in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to limited advanced imaging access, insufficient standardisation, and high cost. This study developed the BREAST-E technique for accurate and standardised breast volume analysis. Methodology A photogrammetry method assessed four ptosis levels: (i) no-ptosis, (ii) mild, [Watterson PA, et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1995;95:1185–94] moderate, and (iv) severe. Key parameters included marker counts (20, 40, and 60), photo angles (10°, 20°, and 30°), and offset adjustments (−0.01, 0, and +0.01). Two-dimensional (2D) images were converted into 3D models via Photomodeler for volume estimation. Clinical validation involved 12 patients (13 breasts) undergoing mastectomy, comparing estimated breast volumes to mastectomy specimens. The primary endpoint was accuracy of volume estimation compared with mastectomy specimen volume, while secondary endpoints included reliability, agreement, and workflow feasibility. Results The BREAST-E technique yielded promising accuracy [Pearson correlation coefficient ( R ) = 0.899 and mean absolute error (MAE) = 98.12 mL] and encouraging reliability (ICC = 0.995–0.996) across ptosis levels. Bland-Altman analysis indicated negligible bias, while Cronbach’s alpha (reaching 0.994) demonstrated robust internal consistency. Clinical validation also implied strong performance ( R = 0.789, MAE = 104.69 mL, and mean error = −27.00 mL). Consequently, no-ptosis presented the highest reliability (ICC = 0.81 and Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92) with minimal bias, whereas moderate and severe ptosis levels demonstrated greater variability. Conclusion This study successfully indicated that a reproducible, accessible, and cost-effective method for analysing breast volume was accomplished through the proposed BREAST-E technique for LMICs.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.