Discovery and Development of a TGFβ3/IL-13 Plasma Risk Score for Preoperative Discrimination of Benign and Malignant Ovarian Adnexal Masses

Background/Objectives: Differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian adnexal masses before surgery is a significant diagnostic challenge. This study examined a wide range of circulating plasma molecules (immune and inflammatory) to identify potential markers to classify tumors as benign or malignant. The goal was to develop a proof-of-concept tool for preoperative risk stratification. Methods: Twenty-three plasma molecules were evaluated in women with benign lesions (n = 68) and women with malignant ovarian tumors (n = 25). To evaluate the behavior of each marker in a normal population, women without adnexal pathology were also included (n = 11). The results were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn post hoc pairwise comparisons, the Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons, and ROC analysis. TGF-β isoforms and CA125 were measured in the complete cohort (n = 104), while the remaining molecules were assessed in a reduced cohort (n = 51). Two classification approaches were developed using TGF-β3 and IL-13: a sequential two-step algorithm and an ordinal logistic regression model. Apparent performance was corrected for optimism using Harrell’s bootstrap procedure. Results: Ten molecules reached statistical significance. Among the significant molecules, TGF-β3 identified ovarian lesions regardless of malignant status (AUC = 0.983), while IL-13 showed perfect malignancy-specific separation from benign cases (AUC = 1.000). Their combination in an ordinal logistic regression model produced three non-overlapping diagnostic strata across all three groups, significantly outperforming CA125, HE4, and ROMA at the malignancy-separation boundary (DeLong p < 0.05) in our exploratory cohort. Conclusions: TGF-β3 and IL-13 represent a biologically complementary marker pair whose combined ordinal regression model shows promising performance and warrants prospective validation in larger, multicenter independent cohorts as a preoperative risk-stratification tool for ovarian adnexal masses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152365
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discovery and Development of a TGFβ3/IL-13 Plasma Risk Score for Preoperative Discrimination of Benign and Malignant Ovarian Adnexal Masses

Alejandro Bravo‐Cuéllar, Alejandro Bravo‐Hernández, Luis Felipe Jave‐Suárez, Marı́a Martha Villaseñor-Garcı́a et al.
Diagnostics
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Discovery and Development of a TGFβ3/IL-13 Plasma Risk Score for Preoperative Discrimination of Benign and Malignant Ovarian Adnexal Masses

Alejandro Bravo‐Cuéllar, Alejandro Bravo‐Hernández, Luis Felipe Jave‐Suárez, Marı́a Martha Villaseñor-Garcı́a, Georgina Hernández‐Flores, Sarah Naomi Guevara-Hernández, Adriana Aguilar‐Lemarroy, Pablo Cesar Ortiz‐Lazareno, Stéphanie López, Raquel Villegas-Pacheco, Jesús García-Gómez, Johanna Lizeth Sáenz-Santibañez
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian adnexal masses before surgery is a significant diagnostic challenge. This study examined a wide range of circulating plasma molecules (immune and inflammatory) to identify potential markers to classify tumors as benign or malignant. The goal was to develop a proof-of-concept tool for preoperative risk stratification. Methods: Twenty-three plasma molecules were evaluated in women with benign lesions (n = 68) and women with malignant ovarian tumors (n = 25). To evaluate the behavior of each marker in a normal population, women without adnexal pathology were also included (n = 11). The results were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn post hoc pairwise comparisons, the Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons, and ROC analysis. TGF-β isoforms and CA125 were measured in the complete cohort (n = 104), while the remaining molecules were assessed in a reduced cohort (n = 51). Two classification approaches were developed using TGF-β3 and IL-13: a sequential two-step algorithm and an ordinal logistic regression model. Apparent performance was corrected for optimism using Harrell’s bootstrap procedure. Results: Ten molecules reached statistical significance. Among the significant molecules, TGF-β3 identified ovarian lesions regardless of malignant status (AUC = 0.983), while IL-13 showed perfect malignancy-specific separation from benign cases (AUC = 1.000). Their combination in an ordinal logistic regression model produced three non-overlapping diagnostic strata across all three groups, significantly outperforming CA125, HE4, and ROMA at the malignancy-separation boundary (DeLong p < 0.05) in our exploratory cohort. Conclusions: TGF-β3 and IL-13 represent a biologically complementary marker pair whose combined ordinal regression model shows promising performance and warrants prospective validation in larger, multicenter independent cohorts as a preoperative risk-stratification tool for ovarian adnexal masses.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(15)
Mexican Social Security Institute (MX), Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit (MX), Hospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio Gonzalez (MX)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.