Comparing Systemic, Localized, and Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Delivery of Evolocumab (α-PCSK9) in a Murine Model of Glioblastoma 2303312

Abstract Introduction Key challenges in treating glioblastoma are the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The PESKe clinical trial (NCT04937413) found that evolocumab (a-PCSK9) treatment increased MHC-I expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration in contrast-enhancing tumors. However, this was not observed in non-enhancing tumors with low concentrations of drug, suggesting that delivery of evolocumab is restricted by the BBB. This study aims to determine effective mechanisms to increase evolocumab delivery to brain tumors, investigating both localized intracranial delivery and targeted focused ultrasound (FUS)-mediated delivery. Methods This study used a MTS assay to optimize in vitro parameters, flow cytometry to evaluate immune effects in vitro and in vivo, and LC-MS to quantify concentrations of intratumoral evolocumab. Results In vitro, it was determined that evolocumab significantly increased MHC-I presentation in CT-2A glioma cells. In vivo, C57Bl/6 mice bearing syngeneic CT-2A tumors were treated with evolocumab either intracranially or intravenously. Flow cytometry at multiple timepoints found no significant difference in MHC-I presentation or T cell infiltration. In the same model, FUS-mediated targeted delivery of evolocumab was compared to systemic delivery, finding that FUS significantly increased both gadolinium contrast-enhancement and intratumoral evolocumab concentrations quantified by LC-MS. There was a significant correlation between contrast-enhancement and concentrations, similar to patient data in the PESKe trial. Conclusion In conclusion, intracranial delivery of evolocumab did not significantly impact immune effects, while FUS-mediated delivery of evolocumab successfully increased intratumoral concentration. Future directions include evaluating the immune effects of FUS-mediated delivery, as well as combining FUS-mediated delivery of evolocumab with anti—PD-1 therapy to improve survival outcomes. Funding Source Duke’s Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Topic Categories Neuroimmunology (NEUR)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jimmun/vkag141.1257
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Systemic, Localized, and Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Delivery of Evolocumab (α-PCSK9) in a Murine Model of Glioblastoma 2303312

Mustafa Khasraw, Sarah Shapley, Katayoun Ayasoufi, William McIntosh et al.
The Journal of Immunology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparing Systemic, Localized, and Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Delivery of Evolocumab (α-PCSK9) in a Murine Model of Glioblastoma 2303312

Mustafa Khasraw, Sarah Shapley, Katayoun Ayasoufi, William McIntosh, Wyatt Austin, Gerald Grant, Kathryn Blethen, Raymond Piatt, G Allan Johnson, Angela Everhart, Matthew Foster
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Key challenges in treating glioblastoma are the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The PESKe clinical trial (NCT04937413) found that evolocumab (a-PCSK9) treatment increased MHC-I expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration in contrast-enhancing tumors. However, this was not observed in non-enhancing tumors with low concentrations of drug, suggesting that delivery of evolocumab is restricted by the BBB. This study aims to determine effective mechanisms to increase evolocumab delivery to brain tumors, investigating both localized intracranial delivery and targeted focused ultrasound (FUS)-mediated delivery. Methods This study used a MTS assay to optimize in vitro parameters, flow cytometry to evaluate immune effects in vitro and in vivo, and LC-MS to quantify concentrations of intratumoral evolocumab. Results In vitro, it was determined that evolocumab significantly increased MHC-I presentation in CT-2A glioma cells. In vivo, C57Bl/6 mice bearing syngeneic CT-2A tumors were treated with evolocumab either intracranially or intravenously. Flow cytometry at multiple timepoints found no significant difference in MHC-I presentation or T cell infiltration. In the same model, FUS-mediated targeted delivery of evolocumab was compared to systemic delivery, finding that FUS significantly increased both gadolinium contrast-enhancement and intratumoral evolocumab concentrations quantified by LC-MS. There was a significant correlation between contrast-enhancement and concentrations, similar to patient data in the PESKe trial. Conclusion In conclusion, intracranial delivery of evolocumab did not significantly impact immune effects, while FUS-mediated delivery of evolocumab successfully increased intratumoral concentration. Future directions include evaluating the immune effects of FUS-mediated delivery, as well as combining FUS-mediated delivery of evolocumab with anti—PD-1 therapy to improve survival outcomes. Funding Source Duke’s Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center Topic Categories Neuroimmunology (NEUR)

The Journal of ImmunologyVol. 215(Supplement_1)
Duke University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.