FXR-Driven Macrophage Reprogramming Enhances Tumor Immunity and Limits Colorectal Cancer Growth 2301033

Abstract Introduction FXR is best known for regulating bile acid metabolism but also has emerging immune functions. How FXR influences tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in colorectal cancer is still unclear. Because TAM-driven immune programs strongly affect tumor progression, defining whether FXR shapes macrophage-mediated tumor immunity is biologically and therapeutically important. We examined whether pharmacologic FXR activation enhances anti-tumor macrophage activity and whether these effects require macrophage-intrinsic FXR. Methods To evaluate FXR gain-of-function, mice in CT26 and AOM-DSS Colitis-associated CRC models were treated with the FXR agonist obeticholic acid (OCA). To test loss-of-function, macrophage-specific FXR-deficient mice (Fxrfl/fl;Cx3cr1-Cre) were generated. Tumor burden, proliferation, and gene expression were examined by caliper measurement, histology, and qPCR. TAM states were analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify M1-like versus M2-like markers, co-stimulatory molecules, and antigen-presentation capacity. Results FXR activation significantly reduced tumor size and weight in both CT26 and AOM—DSS models. OCA treatment downregulated key oncogenes, decreased proliferative markers, and hifted TAMs toward an immunostimulatory profile, with increased M1-associated markers, enhanced co-stimulatory signaling, and elevated antigen-presentation pathways. In contrast, macrophage-specific FXR loss markedly accelerated tumor growth, increased spleen weight, heightened oncogene expression, and drove TAMs toward an immunosuppressive, M2-like phenotype with reduced antigen-presentation ability. Conclusion These findings identify macrophage FXR as a critical regulator of tumor immunity in CRC. FXR activation enhances anti-tumor macrophage programming and suppresses tumor progression, while macrophage-intrinsic loss of FXR impairs immune activation and promotes tumor growth. FXR represents a promising therapeutic target for reconditioning the tumor microenvironment in CRC. Funding Source n/a Topic Categories Tumor Immunology: Cellular Responses and Tumor Microevironment (TIME)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jimmun/vkag141.1225
Primary Topic
Immune cells in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FXR-Driven Macrophage Reprogramming Enhances Tumor Immunity and Limits Colorectal Cancer Growth 2301033

Fei Sun, Xingchen Dong, Jonathan Sze, Ting Fu
The Journal of Immunology
Immune cells in cancer
article

FXR-Driven Macrophage Reprogramming Enhances Tumor Immunity and Limits Colorectal Cancer Growth 2301033

Fei Sun, Xingchen Dong, Jonathan Sze, Ting Fu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction FXR is best known for regulating bile acid metabolism but also has emerging immune functions. How FXR influences tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in colorectal cancer is still unclear. Because TAM-driven immune programs strongly affect tumor progression, defining whether FXR shapes macrophage-mediated tumor immunity is biologically and therapeutically important. We examined whether pharmacologic FXR activation enhances anti-tumor macrophage activity and whether these effects require macrophage-intrinsic FXR. Methods To evaluate FXR gain-of-function, mice in CT26 and AOM-DSS Colitis-associated CRC models were treated with the FXR agonist obeticholic acid (OCA). To test loss-of-function, macrophage-specific FXR-deficient mice (Fxrfl/fl;Cx3cr1-Cre) were generated. Tumor burden, proliferation, and gene expression were examined by caliper measurement, histology, and qPCR. TAM states were analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify M1-like versus M2-like markers, co-stimulatory molecules, and antigen-presentation capacity. Results FXR activation significantly reduced tumor size and weight in both CT26 and AOM—DSS models. OCA treatment downregulated key oncogenes, decreased proliferative markers, and hifted TAMs toward an immunostimulatory profile, with increased M1-associated markers, enhanced co-stimulatory signaling, and elevated antigen-presentation pathways. In contrast, macrophage-specific FXR loss markedly accelerated tumor growth, increased spleen weight, heightened oncogene expression, and drove TAMs toward an immunosuppressive, M2-like phenotype with reduced antigen-presentation ability. Conclusion These findings identify macrophage FXR as a critical regulator of tumor immunity in CRC. FXR activation enhances anti-tumor macrophage programming and suppresses tumor progression, while macrophage-intrinsic loss of FXR impairs immune activation and promotes tumor growth. FXR represents a promising therapeutic target for reconditioning the tumor microenvironment in CRC. Funding Source n/a Topic Categories Tumor Immunology: Cellular Responses and Tumor Microevironment (TIME)

The Journal of ImmunologyVol. 215(Supplement_1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Immune cells in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.