Transforming Orthopaedic Trauma Care: Forecasting Operating Room Demand by Harnessing Time-Series Analysis and Machine Learning

Background: Efficient allocation of operating room (OR) time is critical in trauma centers, where unpredictable volumes lead to wasted resources. Forecasting trauma volume is challenging, but integrating exogenous factors with historical patterns may enable proactive scheduling tailored to daily operative demand. This study develops time-series and machine learning models to predict daily orthopaedic trauma operative caseloads. Methods: Data for patients undergoing operative management for orthopaedic trauma from January 2012 to December 2023 were aggregated. Models predicted daily caseload in hours using features from hospital records plus regional population and environmental data. Data were split in chronological order into the training set (70%), the validation set (15%), and the test set (15%). Time-series and machine learning models were trained to minimize the mean absolute error (MAE). We evaluated the model’s accuracy in predicting 7-hour and 8-hour clinical volume thresholds, using 95% predictive intervals (PIs), and compared its performance with rolling averages and an intuitive model. Results: A total of 9,637 procedures were included. The mean daily caseload was 8.17 ± 5.38 hours. Pattern mining and discovery seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (PMD-SARIMA) with manually selected features achieved the lowest test MAE of 1.80 hours, outperforming rolling averages over 7 days (MAE, 4.37 hours), 14 days (MAE, 4.23 hours), and 30 days (MAE, 4.15 hours) and intuitive modeling (MAE, 4.73 hours). Most machine learning and time-series models correctly predicted whether daily caseload would exceed an 8-hour OR block ≥85% (95% PI, 77% to 96%) of the time, substantially outperforming rolling average baselines (49% to 57%). Conclusions: Integrating exogenous environmental, temporal, and system-level factors with historical trauma patterns enabled accurate forecasting of daily orthopaedic trauma caseload, substantially outperforming current models. This framework serves as a template that trauma centers can calibrate to their local context to support OR scheduling, staffing, and resource allocation. Clinical Relevance: This predictive framework enables trauma centers to proactively allocate OR time and surgical staff in response to anticipated daily demand. By optimizing these operational resources, hospitals can minimize surgical delays and ensure timely, efficient care delivery for patients with orthopaedic trauma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.26.00014
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transforming Orthopaedic Trauma Care: Forecasting Operating Room Demand by Harnessing Time-Series Analysis and Machine Learning

Michael Simone, Avery B. Nathens, Aazad Abbas, Johnathan R. Lex et al.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Transforming Orthopaedic Trauma Care: Forecasting Operating Room Demand by Harnessing Time-Series Analysis and Machine Learning

Michael Simone, Avery B. Nathens, Aazad Abbas, Johnathan R. Lex, Albert Yee, David Li, Jay Toor, Dharsan Ravindran, Cari Whyne, Elias Khalil
article en

Abstract

Background: Efficient allocation of operating room (OR) time is critical in trauma centers, where unpredictable volumes lead to wasted resources. Forecasting trauma volume is challenging, but integrating exogenous factors with historical patterns may enable proactive scheduling tailored to daily operative demand. This study develops time-series and machine learning models to predict daily orthopaedic trauma operative caseloads. Methods: Data for patients undergoing operative management for orthopaedic trauma from January 2012 to December 2023 were aggregated. Models predicted daily caseload in hours using features from hospital records plus regional population and environmental data. Data were split in chronological order into the training set (70%), the validation set (15%), and the test set (15%). Time-series and machine learning models were trained to minimize the mean absolute error (MAE). We evaluated the model’s accuracy in predicting 7-hour and 8-hour clinical volume thresholds, using 95% predictive intervals (PIs), and compared its performance with rolling averages and an intuitive model. Results: A total of 9,637 procedures were included. The mean daily caseload was 8.17 ± 5.38 hours. Pattern mining and discovery seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (PMD-SARIMA) with manually selected features achieved the lowest test MAE of 1.80 hours, outperforming rolling averages over 7 days (MAE, 4.37 hours), 14 days (MAE, 4.23 hours), and 30 days (MAE, 4.15 hours) and intuitive modeling (MAE, 4.73 hours). Most machine learning and time-series models correctly predicted whether daily caseload would exceed an 8-hour OR block ≥85% (95% PI, 77% to 96%) of the time, substantially outperforming rolling average baselines (49% to 57%). Conclusions: Integrating exogenous environmental, temporal, and system-level factors with historical trauma patterns enabled accurate forecasting of daily orthopaedic trauma caseload, substantially outperforming current models. This framework serves as a template that trauma centers can calibrate to their local context to support OR scheduling, staffing, and resource allocation. Clinical Relevance: This predictive framework enables trauma centers to proactively allocate OR time and surgical staff in response to anticipated daily demand. By optimizing these operational resources, hospitals can minimize surgical delays and ensure timely, efficient care delivery for patients with orthopaedic trauma.

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.