Clinical Rationale for Procedural Steps When Performing Non‐Incisional Nail Surgery: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Non-incisional nail surgery is a common surgical procedure performed by clinicians, however, there is considerable variation relating to decision-making for procedure choice, surgical technique, and clinical rationale to inform practice. The aim of this scoping review is to map the extent and type of evidence relevant to surgical approach, decision-making, and clinical rationale informing non-incisional nail surgery in clinical practice. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were full text papers, available in English that discussed non-incisional nail surgery with or without matrixectomy and included procedural steps and evidence of a clinical rationale to inform practice. A systematic search was conducted of the following databases: Medline, Web of Science, Emcare, CINAHL, ProQuest (Health and Medical), ProQuest (Nursing and Allied Health) and Health Collection. The reference lists of review articles were screened for additional studies. Relevant data were extracted, charted, and grouped into categories. Compiled data were then transferred into summary tables as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 110 articles were included in this review. The articles were published between 1965 - 2025. The procedural steps and clinical rationale were grouped into themes, highlighting a considerable variation in practice relating to tourniquet use, matrixectomy method, concentration of caustic agent, application time and irrigation practices following cauterisation. CONCLUSIONS: This review has identified inconsistency in the documented practice of non-incisional nail surgery based on published literature spanning a period of 37 years. Specifically, this surgical intervention appears to be informed by historical practice and there is little evidence of a common approach. The authors propose that clinical practice guidelines are needed to provide an evidence-based approach to decision-making in non-incisional nail surgery. The development of clinical guidelines including a structured decision-making framework, would support consistency in practice and facilitate evidence-based decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70191
Primary Topic
Nail Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Rationale for Procedural Steps When Performing Non‐Incisional Nail Surgery: A Scoping Review

Luke Donnan, Caroline Robinson, Anna Horn
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Nail Diseases and Treatments
article

Clinical Rationale for Procedural Steps When Performing Non‐Incisional Nail Surgery: A Scoping Review

Luke Donnan, Caroline Robinson, Anna Horn
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-incisional nail surgery is a common surgical procedure performed by clinicians, however, there is considerable variation relating to decision-making for procedure choice, surgical technique, and clinical rationale to inform practice. The aim of this scoping review is to map the extent and type of evidence relevant to surgical approach, decision-making, and clinical rationale informing non-incisional nail surgery in clinical practice. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were full text papers, available in English that discussed non-incisional nail surgery with or without matrixectomy and included procedural steps and evidence of a clinical rationale to inform practice. A systematic search was conducted of the following databases: Medline, Web of Science, Emcare, CINAHL, ProQuest (Health and Medical), ProQuest (Nursing and Allied Health) and Health Collection. The reference lists of review articles were screened for additional studies. Relevant data were extracted, charted, and grouped into categories. Compiled data were then transferred into summary tables as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 110 articles were included in this review. The articles were published between 1965 - 2025. The procedural steps and clinical rationale were grouped into themes, highlighting a considerable variation in practice relating to tourniquet use, matrixectomy method, concentration of caustic agent, application time and irrigation practices following cauterisation. CONCLUSIONS: This review has identified inconsistency in the documented practice of non-incisional nail surgery based on published literature spanning a period of 37 years. Specifically, this surgical intervention appears to be informed by historical practice and there is little evidence of a common approach. The authors propose that clinical practice guidelines are needed to provide an evidence-based approach to decision-making in non-incisional nail surgery. The development of clinical guidelines including a structured decision-making framework, would support consistency in practice and facilitate evidence-based decision-making.

Journal of Foot and Ankle ResearchVol. 19(3)
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nail Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.