Watching reasoning at work: eye movement patterns of participants with ADHD solving Raven´s matrices

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has been associated with broad cognitive deficits, particularly in tasks regarding working memory and executive control. However, how individuals with ADHD process visual reasoning tasks remains largely unclear. In typically developing (TD) individuals, two main problem-solving strategies have been described for Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (RSPM): Constructive Matching (CM) is an efficient processing style involving hypothesis generation and integration of relations in working memory, whereas Answer Elimination (AE) is a less demanding trial-and-error approach. This study examined group differences in processing style using eye-tracking during RSPM solving and explored the role of individual cognitive ability in strategy use. Seventy-nine participants (38 ADHD, 41 TD) completed a validated 9-item short form of the RSPM while their eye movements were recorded. Gaze parameters reflecting CM, AE and speed parameters were analyzed. Participants with ADHD showed reduced RSPM accuracy alongside normal CM and adaptation to increasing item difficulty. In this group, furthermore, RSPM item difficulty interacted with Culture Fair Test(CFT)-assessed intelligence such that CM-related adaptation to trial difficulty from easy to medium items (but not medium to hard) was more pronounced in participants with ADHD with higher CFT-assessed intelligence. This association with CFT-assessed intelligence was absent in controls. Our findings suggest that participants with ADHD show normal RSPM processing style (CM and adaptation to varying task demands) despite reduced accuracy and that higher intelligence may improve processing style up to a certain point of task complexity. Our results confirm the assumed compensatory role of intelligence for cognition in ADHD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-026-03038-y
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Watching reasoning at work: eye movement patterns of participants with ADHD solving Raven´s matrices

Christoph Klein, Ulf Thiemann, Jana Bretthauer, Monica Biscaldi et al.
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

Watching reasoning at work: eye movement patterns of participants with ADHD solving Raven´s matrices

Christoph Klein, Ulf Thiemann, Jana Bretthauer, Monica Biscaldi, Stephan Bender, Daniela Canu, André Beauducel, Christian Fleischhaker, Nikolaos Smyrnis
article en

Abstract

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has been associated with broad cognitive deficits, particularly in tasks regarding working memory and executive control. However, how individuals with ADHD process visual reasoning tasks remains largely unclear. In typically developing (TD) individuals, two main problem-solving strategies have been described for Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (RSPM): Constructive Matching (CM) is an efficient processing style involving hypothesis generation and integration of relations in working memory, whereas Answer Elimination (AE) is a less demanding trial-and-error approach. This study examined group differences in processing style using eye-tracking during RSPM solving and explored the role of individual cognitive ability in strategy use. Seventy-nine participants (38 ADHD, 41 TD) completed a validated 9-item short form of the RSPM while their eye movements were recorded. Gaze parameters reflecting CM, AE and speed parameters were analyzed. Participants with ADHD showed reduced RSPM accuracy alongside normal CM and adaptation to increasing item difficulty. In this group, furthermore, RSPM item difficulty interacted with Culture Fair Test(CFT)-assessed intelligence such that CM-related adaptation to trial difficulty from easy to medium items (but not medium to hard) was more pronounced in participants with ADHD with higher CFT-assessed intelligence. This association with CFT-assessed intelligence was absent in controls. Our findings suggest that participants with ADHD show normal RSPM processing style (CM and adaptation to varying task demands) despite reduced accuracy and that higher intelligence may improve processing style up to a certain point of task complexity. Our results confirm the assumed compensatory role of intelligence for cognition in ADHD.

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
University of Bonn (DE), University of Cologne (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), University Mental Health Research Institute (GR), LVR-Klinik Bonn (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.