Categorizing Alternative Seismic Sources Based on Their Potential to Affect Marine Mammals

Seismic airguns generate high intensity noise that can affect marine life. Emerging alternative seismic sources offer promising opportunities to reduce acoustic impacts, yet their performance and integration into regulatory processes remain poorly quantified. We evaluated four recently developed alternative seismic sources to characterize their acoustic outputs, assess their relative impacts on marine mammals, and classify them within the tiered framework of the Operational National Mitigation Protocol for Geophysical Surveys—developed collaboratively by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), and Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE). The assessment included three ultra low-frequency (ULF) pneumatic sources (Tuned Pulse SourceTM [TPSTM], Gemini SourceTM, and HarmonyTM) and a representative marine vibroseis (MV) system. Using NMFS auditory injury and behavioral disturbance thresholds alongside a new (60 s M-weighted sound exposure level) metric, we found that all alternatives produced lower 60 s energy and smaller auditory injury zones than conventional high impact airgun arrays. ULF pneumatic sources concentrate energy below 10 Hz, contributing to reduced exposure at ecologically relevant frequencies. TPSTM and the Gemini SourceTM align with moderate impact tiers, while HarmonyTM is more similar to higher impact sources. For MV systems, single and dual element configurations are placed in a lower impact tier, though an 18-element array requires further characterization before classification. Remaining uncertainties, including limited behavioral data and incomplete source characterization, highlight the need for continued empirical research. By offering a science-based framework, this work contributes to regulatory modernization, advances efforts to reduce ocean noise, and enables the responsible adoption of emerging “quieter” seismic technologies within a more consistent and streamlined approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14151379
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Categorizing Alternative Seismic Sources Based on Their Potential to Affect Marine Mammals

Morgan J. Martin, Alexander Conrad, Erica Staaterman, James Caplinger
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Marine animal studies overview
article

Categorizing Alternative Seismic Sources Based on Their Potential to Affect Marine Mammals

Morgan J. Martin, Alexander Conrad, Erica Staaterman, James Caplinger
article en

Abstract

Seismic airguns generate high intensity noise that can affect marine life. Emerging alternative seismic sources offer promising opportunities to reduce acoustic impacts, yet their performance and integration into regulatory processes remain poorly quantified. We evaluated four recently developed alternative seismic sources to characterize their acoustic outputs, assess their relative impacts on marine mammals, and classify them within the tiered framework of the Operational National Mitigation Protocol for Geophysical Surveys—developed collaboratively by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), and Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE). The assessment included three ultra low-frequency (ULF) pneumatic sources (Tuned Pulse SourceTM [TPSTM], Gemini SourceTM, and HarmonyTM) and a representative marine vibroseis (MV) system. Using NMFS auditory injury and behavioral disturbance thresholds alongside a new (60 s M-weighted sound exposure level) metric, we found that all alternatives produced lower 60 s energy and smaller auditory injury zones than conventional high impact airgun arrays. ULF pneumatic sources concentrate energy below 10 Hz, contributing to reduced exposure at ecologically relevant frequencies. TPSTM and the Gemini SourceTM align with moderate impact tiers, while HarmonyTM is more similar to higher impact sources. For MV systems, single and dual element configurations are placed in a lower impact tier, though an 18-element array requires further characterization before classification. Remaining uncertainties, including limited behavioral data and incomplete source characterization, highlight the need for continued empirical research. By offering a science-based framework, this work contributes to regulatory modernization, advances efforts to reduce ocean noise, and enables the responsible adoption of emerging “quieter” seismic technologies within a more consistent and streamlined approach.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 14(15)
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), NOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (US), Marine Acoustics (United States) (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Marine animal studies overview
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.