Künstliche Intelligenz aus Sicht katholischer Religionslehrkräfte in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Sekundäranalyse zu didaktischen Nutzungsprofilen, professionsbezogenen Orientierungen und religionsethischen Grenzziehungen

Abstract The article presents a focused secondary analysis of the German subsample (n = 102) of a German-Polish online survey on Catholic religious education teachers’ engagement with (generative) AI. It analyses didactic use profiles, professional orientations, and religious-ethical boundary-setting in confessional religious education. The findings reveal a pattern of controlled ambivalence: AI systems are regarded as helpful primarily for planning, structuring, and creating materials, but only to a limited extent for spiritual development, hermeneutical interpretation, and ethical judgment. At the same time, they highlight an increased need to ensure a professionally reflective and responsible use of AI in religious education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Practical Theology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijpt-2026-0018
Primary Topic
Religious Education and Schools
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Künstliche Intelligenz aus Sicht katholischer Religionslehrkräfte in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Sekundäranalyse zu didaktischen Nutzungsprofilen, professionsbezogenen Orientierungen und religionsethischen Grenzziehungen

Mariusz Chrostowski, Paweł Mąkosa
International Journal of Practical Theology
Religious Education and Schools
article

Künstliche Intelligenz aus Sicht katholischer Religionslehrkräfte in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Sekundäranalyse zu didaktischen Nutzungsprofilen, professionsbezogenen Orientierungen und religionsethischen Grenzziehungen

Mariusz Chrostowski, Paweł Mąkosa
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article presents a focused secondary analysis of the German subsample (n = 102) of a German-Polish online survey on Catholic religious education teachers’ engagement with (generative) AI. It analyses didactic use profiles, professional orientations, and religious-ethical boundary-setting in confessional religious education. The findings reveal a pattern of controlled ambivalence: AI systems are regarded as helpful primarily for planning, structuring, and creating materials, but only to a limited extent for spiritual development, hermeneutical interpretation, and ethical judgment. At the same time, they highlight an increased need to ensure a professionally reflective and responsible use of AI in religious education.

International Journal of Practical Theology
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL), Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Religious Education and Schools
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Künstliche Intelligenz aus Sicht katholischer Religionslehrkräfte in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Sekundäranalyse zu didaktischen Nutzungsprofilen, professionsbezogenen Orientierungen und religionsethischen Grenzziehungen — Mariusz Chrostowski, Paweł Mąkosa · International Journal of Practical Theology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS