On the Spirit of Science

The core essence of science lies in welcoming questioning, accepting debate and confronting logical flaws. The mainstream quantum physics system centred on Schrödinger’s superposition of alive and dead states and the electron probability cloud completely abandons this fundamental principle, forming a closed and exclusive academic circle. When confronted with external doubts, this system rejects logical deduction, comparative data analysis and in-depth physical mechanism explanations, merely dismissing all objections with the excuse "you cannot understand". Meanwhile, it labels all divergent viewpoints as amateur non-academic theories to completely block all critical thinking channels. Human beings are inherently incapable of intuitively grasping numerous physical scales and velocities, including the speed of light, the microscopic scale of atoms, and the hundreds of kilometres per second orbital speeds of galaxies. Nevertheless, macroscopic physics has never resorted to metaphysical theories that contradict causality on account of such cognitive limitations. Galaxies maintain fixed orbits through chain gravitational interactions, and electrons moving at a comparable order of magnitude ought to possess stable circumambient trajectories. The probability cloud and superposition are merely dogmas fabricated by academia to cover up limitations in observational technology. More egregiously, mainstream research communities invest hundreds of millions or even billions of funds to construct experimental facilities for microscopic particle detection, acquiring raw observational data from direct measurements. Yet they refuse to face the objective truths revealed by such raw data, instead selectively filtering, distorting and misinterpreting experimental outcomes to force-fit observational facts to pre-assumed probabilistic superposition hypotheses. Their sole motive is to prop up a theoretically flawed narrative they have committed to defending. The closed academic circle suppresses all outside questioning and refuses rational, equal discussion, operating in a manner identical to ancient shamans monopolizing the authority to interpret natural phenomena. Mainstream researchers who control vast research budgets, experimental equipment and academic discourse power, yet evade rigorous argumentation, distort empirical evidence and reject counterarguments, are the true adherents of occult pseudoscience who betray the spirit of scientific inquiry.