Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version Critical Care Nurses’ Evaluation Scale of Nursing Activities for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation–Supported Patients

Background: Given the lack of an instrument for evaluating nursing activities related to extracorporeal membrane venovenous oxygenation (ECMO) in intensive care settings. We then examined the psychometric properties of the critical care nurses’ evaluation scale of nursing activities for ECMO-supported patients (ECMO-SP). Methods: Utilizing the Brislin translation model and expert consultation, we translated and cross-culturally adapted the scale, then employed convenience sampling to select nurses from the intensive care units (ICUs) of 3 tertiary hospitals in Henan Province. Results: The Chinese version scale comprised 4 dimensions with 20 items, demonstrating a cumulative variance contribution of 67.76%. The content validity index (CVI) for the overall scale was 0.921, S-CVI/Ave ranging from 0.857 to 1.000. The Cronbach α was 0.945, and the Cronbach α for each dimension ranged from 0.864 to 0.919. The split-half reliability coefficient was 0.864, and the test-retest reliability (ICC) was 0.612. The scale demonstrated satisfactory convergent validity. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the scale exhibits robust reliability and validity, thus supporting its use for ECMO-SP nursing activities among ICU nurses in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/dcc.0000000000000771
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version Critical Care Nurses’ Evaluation Scale of Nursing Activities for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation–Supported Patients

Weiqing Zhang, Yaxuan Wu, Yabing Cao, SONG Jielu et al.
Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version Critical Care Nurses’ Evaluation Scale of Nursing Activities for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation–Supported Patients

Weiqing Zhang, Yaxuan Wu, Yabing Cao, SONG Jielu, Haojie Wang, Huiqin Zhang, Kun Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: Given the lack of an instrument for evaluating nursing activities related to extracorporeal membrane venovenous oxygenation (ECMO) in intensive care settings. We then examined the psychometric properties of the critical care nurses’ evaluation scale of nursing activities for ECMO-supported patients (ECMO-SP). Methods: Utilizing the Brislin translation model and expert consultation, we translated and cross-culturally adapted the scale, then employed convenience sampling to select nurses from the intensive care units (ICUs) of 3 tertiary hospitals in Henan Province. Results: The Chinese version scale comprised 4 dimensions with 20 items, demonstrating a cumulative variance contribution of 67.76%. The content validity index (CVI) for the overall scale was 0.921, S-CVI/Ave ranging from 0.857 to 1.000. The Cronbach α was 0.945, and the Cronbach α for each dimension ranged from 0.864 to 0.919. The split-half reliability coefficient was 0.864, and the test-retest reliability (ICC) was 0.612. The scale demonstrated satisfactory convergent validity. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the scale exhibits robust reliability and validity, thus supporting its use for ECMO-SP nursing activities among ICU nurses in China.

Dimensions of Critical Care NursingVol. 45(5)
Zhengzhou University (CN), Zhengzhou Children's Hospital (CN), Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.