Staff experiences of a newly developed blended learning program to improve diabetes management at orthopedic clinics

Errors in diabetes treatment are among the most frequently reported adverse events in hospitals and orthopaedic care. This study aimed to identify the learning needs of orthopaedic staff, develop a blended diabetes learning programme, and examine orthopaedic staff experiences of participating in the programme. Nurses and physicians from endocrinological and orthopedic wards at three hospitals in the capital region of Denmark (Bispebjerg, Herlev, Nordsjællands Hospitals) participated in group concept mapping. A total of 193 orthopedic staffmembers completed an e-learning module and 174 attended one of 12 face-to-face classes. We used thematic analysis to analyze data from four focus group interviews ( n = 14 nurses) and observations from face-to-face classes. We identified 12 learning objectives and identified three overall themes from thematic analysis: learning through cases , combining e-learning and face-to-face course s, and from learning to practice. These themes explained processes and contexts that facilitated or inhibited learning. This study identified several key contexts (time, place, level of knowledge, nurse seniority, organisational support) and critical processes (educators’ facilitation, scaffolding, case-based learning) that influence physicians and nurses learning experience and applying it in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09819-y
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Staff experiences of a newly developed blended learning program to improve diabetes management at orthopedic clinics

ULLA BJERRE-CHRISTENSEN, P Banck-Petersen, T. Almdal, Charlotte Schiøtz et al.
BMC Medical Education
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Staff experiences of a newly developed blended learning program to improve diabetes management at orthopedic clinics

ULLA BJERRE-CHRISTENSEN, P Banck-Petersen, T. Almdal, Charlotte Schiøtz, Katrine Bagge Hansen, Lone Lindegaard Nordin, Mette Andersen Nexø, Charlotte Lærke Weitze, Susanne Myrup Houe, Ole Lander Svendsen, Kirsten Lomborg, Anna Jessen, Peter Lommer Kristensen
article en

Abstract

Errors in diabetes treatment are among the most frequently reported adverse events in hospitals and orthopaedic care. This study aimed to identify the learning needs of orthopaedic staff, develop a blended diabetes learning programme, and examine orthopaedic staff experiences of participating in the programme. Nurses and physicians from endocrinological and orthopedic wards at three hospitals in the capital region of Denmark (Bispebjerg, Herlev, Nordsjællands Hospitals) participated in group concept mapping. A total of 193 orthopedic staffmembers completed an e-learning module and 174 attended one of 12 face-to-face classes. We used thematic analysis to analyze data from four focus group interviews ( n = 14 nurses) and observations from face-to-face classes. We identified 12 learning objectives and identified three overall themes from thematic analysis: learning through cases , combining e-learning and face-to-face course s, and from learning to practice. These themes explained processes and contexts that facilitated or inhibited learning. This study identified several key contexts (time, place, level of knowledge, nurse seniority, organisational support) and critical processes (educators’ facilitation, scaffolding, case-based learning) that influence physicians and nurses learning experience and applying it in practice.

BMC Medical Education
University of Copenhagen (DK), Steno Diabetes Centers (DK), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Nordsjællands Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.