Does Corporate Digital Governance Influence Corporate Sustainability Reporting Transparency? Evidence From Ghana

ABSTRACT Although sustainability reporting has gained prominence as a mechanism for corporate responsibility, the transparency, and credibility of disclosed sustainability information remain inadequate, especially in emerging nations where technology adoption is uneven. This study examines the influence of digital governance (DG) on corporate sustainability reporting transparency (CSRT), taking into account the mediating effect of digital technologies (DTs) and the moderating effect of external assurance (EA). This study is grounded in stakeholder and institutional theory. Primary data were collected from 350 participants from various firms in Ghana using structured survey questionnaires. A purposive sampling approach was used to select participant firms. The data were analyzed using SmartPLS 4, following the partial least squares structural equation model (PLS‐SEM) approach. The study results showed that DG positively and significantly influences CSRT. Moreover, DT significantly mediates the relationship between DG and CSRT, and EA significantly moderates this relationship. The study's insights guide policymakers to promote enabling digital regulatory regimes, as well as business managers investing in technological infrastructure and assurance practices, and to enhance sustainability reporting quality and stakeholder confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71348
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Corporate Digital Governance Influence Corporate Sustainability Reporting Transparency? Evidence From Ghana

Yuxuan Du, Inusah Sulemana, Maalisuo Bismark Sakpiti
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Does Corporate Digital Governance Influence Corporate Sustainability Reporting Transparency? Evidence From Ghana

Yuxuan Du, Inusah Sulemana, Maalisuo Bismark Sakpiti
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although sustainability reporting has gained prominence as a mechanism for corporate responsibility, the transparency, and credibility of disclosed sustainability information remain inadequate, especially in emerging nations where technology adoption is uneven. This study examines the influence of digital governance (DG) on corporate sustainability reporting transparency (CSRT), taking into account the mediating effect of digital technologies (DTs) and the moderating effect of external assurance (EA). This study is grounded in stakeholder and institutional theory. Primary data were collected from 350 participants from various firms in Ghana using structured survey questionnaires. A purposive sampling approach was used to select participant firms. The data were analyzed using SmartPLS 4, following the partial least squares structural equation model (PLS‐SEM) approach. The study results showed that DG positively and significantly influences CSRT. Moreover, DT significantly mediates the relationship between DG and CSRT, and EA significantly moderates this relationship. The study's insights guide policymakers to promote enabling digital regulatory regimes, as well as business managers investing in technological infrastructure and assurance practices, and to enhance sustainability reporting quality and stakeholder confidence.

Business Strategy and the Environment
Jiangsu University (CN), Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.