Decentralised autonomous organisations and the future of arbitration: a critical examination of on-chain and off-chain mechanisms

Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs) raise fundamental questions for private law. While scholarly and regulatory attention has primarily focused on the legal status and governance of DAOs, comparatively little consideration has been given to how disputes involving these organisations should be resolved. This article examines the suitability of dispute resolution mechanisms for DAO-related disputes. Analysing the principal categories of disputes that have emerged in practice, the article critically evaluates blockchain-based dispute resolution mechanisms alongside traditional arbitration, in light of due process, enforceability, party autonomy, and the unique features of decentralised governance. It argues that neither purely code-based dispute resolution nor conventional litigation provides a satisfactory response to the complexity of DAO disputes. It concludes that arbitration, appropriately adapted to the technological and organisational realities of DAOs, offers the most promising framework for balancing decentralisation, legal certainty, and procedural fairness within the evolving Web3 ecosystem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Innovation and Technology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2026.2705126
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decentralised autonomous organisations and the future of arbitration: a critical examination of on-chain and off-chain mechanisms

Pınar Çağlayan Aksoy, Yaren Alparslan
Law Innovation and Technology
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Decentralised autonomous organisations and the future of arbitration: a critical examination of on-chain and off-chain mechanisms

Pınar Çağlayan Aksoy, Yaren Alparslan
article en

Abstract

Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs) raise fundamental questions for private law. While scholarly and regulatory attention has primarily focused on the legal status and governance of DAOs, comparatively little consideration has been given to how disputes involving these organisations should be resolved. This article examines the suitability of dispute resolution mechanisms for DAO-related disputes. Analysing the principal categories of disputes that have emerged in practice, the article critically evaluates blockchain-based dispute resolution mechanisms alongside traditional arbitration, in light of due process, enforceability, party autonomy, and the unique features of decentralised governance. It argues that neither purely code-based dispute resolution nor conventional litigation provides a satisfactory response to the complexity of DAO disputes. It concludes that arbitration, appropriately adapted to the technological and organisational realities of DAOs, offers the most promising framework for balancing decentralisation, legal certainty, and procedural fairness within the evolving Web3 ecosystem.

Law Innovation and Technology
Bilkent University (TR), Office of the Attorney General (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decentralised autonomous organisations and the future of arbitration: a critical examination of on-chain and off-chain mechanisms — Pınar Çağlayan Aksoy, Yaren Alparslan · Law Innovation and Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS