Computer Programming as Cultural Practice

This review reconceptualizes computer programming as a cultural practice rather than neutral technical work, synthesizing anthropological scholarship on coding, software development, and computational expertise as social activities embedded in global political economies. Three tensions animate this literature. First, despite meritocratic claims, supposedly objective technical evaluations reproduce hierarchies of race, gender, nation, and class. Second, although coding promises borderless geographies—from Silicon Valley corporations to Indian IT workers, Chinese makers, and Brazilian fab labs—tech work organizes bodies differentially through nationality, currency access, and racialized embodiment. Third, even when claiming craft autonomy, programmers increasingly work as contingent contractors, privatizing economic risk. As artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tools emerge, the resulting transformations intensify rather than resolve these contradictions, demanding ethnographic attention to whose code work matters and under what conditions. This review also demonstrates how coding logics extend beyond software to inform analytical vocabularies scholars mobilize to theorize distributed agency, layered systems, and automated governance—showing how programming shapes the very frameworks we use to interpret contemporary capitalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041624-015703
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computer Programming as Cultural Practice

Héctor Beltrán
Annual Review of Anthropology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Computer Programming as Cultural Practice

Héctor Beltrán
article en

Abstract

This review reconceptualizes computer programming as a cultural practice rather than neutral technical work, synthesizing anthropological scholarship on coding, software development, and computational expertise as social activities embedded in global political economies. Three tensions animate this literature. First, despite meritocratic claims, supposedly objective technical evaluations reproduce hierarchies of race, gender, nation, and class. Second, although coding promises borderless geographies—from Silicon Valley corporations to Indian IT workers, Chinese makers, and Brazilian fab labs—tech work organizes bodies differentially through nationality, currency access, and racialized embodiment. Third, even when claiming craft autonomy, programmers increasingly work as contingent contractors, privatizing economic risk. As artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tools emerge, the resulting transformations intensify rather than resolve these contradictions, demanding ethnographic attention to whose code work matters and under what conditions. This review also demonstrates how coding logics extend beyond software to inform analytical vocabularies scholars mobilize to theorize distributed agency, layered systems, and automated governance—showing how programming shapes the very frameworks we use to interpret contemporary capitalism.

Annual Review of Anthropology
IIT@MIT (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.