Paths of war: Route ecologies and guerrilla mobility in Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle, 1963–1979

This article examines how guerrillas from the Zimbabwe African National Liberation Army (ZANLA) and the Zimbabwe People’s Revolutionary Army (ZIPRA) moved into and out of Rhodesia between 1963 and 1979. It argues that infiltration and exfiltration routes were dynamic mobility systems shaped by terrain, civilian networks, regional politics, and counterinsurgency. Rather than a logistical background, control over movement was central to sustaining the war. Drawing on oral and archival sources, this analysis shows that ZANLA relied on flexible eastern corridors, initially through Zambia in the earliest phases of the liberation war and later through Mozambique, especially after its independence in 1975, while ZIPRA Army used more structured northern and western routes via Zambia and Botswana, all of which continuously adapted to Rhodesian counterinsurgency pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian and African Studies
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096261461943
Primary Topic
African studies and sociopolitical issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paths of war: Route ecologies and guerrilla mobility in Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle, 1963–1979

Takawira Chatambudza
Journal of Asian and African Studies
African studies and sociopolitical issues
article

Paths of war: Route ecologies and guerrilla mobility in Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle, 1963–1979

Takawira Chatambudza
article en

Abstract

This article examines how guerrillas from the Zimbabwe African National Liberation Army (ZANLA) and the Zimbabwe People’s Revolutionary Army (ZIPRA) moved into and out of Rhodesia between 1963 and 1979. It argues that infiltration and exfiltration routes were dynamic mobility systems shaped by terrain, civilian networks, regional politics, and counterinsurgency. Rather than a logistical background, control over movement was central to sustaining the war. Drawing on oral and archival sources, this analysis shows that ZANLA relied on flexible eastern corridors, initially through Zambia in the earliest phases of the liberation war and later through Mozambique, especially after its independence in 1975, while ZIPRA Army used more structured northern and western routes via Zambia and Botswana, all of which continuously adapted to Rhodesian counterinsurgency pressure.

Journal of Asian and African Studies
University of Calgary (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
African studies and sociopolitical issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Paths of war: Route ecologies and guerrilla mobility in Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle, 1963–1979 — Takawira Chatambudza · Journal of Asian and African Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS