Does local empowerment come at an ecological cost? Evidence from China’s county power expansion reform

This study examines how enhanced local autonomy affects ecological quality by analysing China’s County Power Expansion reform, which granted unprecedented fiscal and administrative powers to county governments. Using a comprehensive ecological index that captures multiple environmental dimensions, we find that the reform is associated with a decline of 0.64 index points in local ecological quality. This deterioration is associated with a stronger prioritization of economic development, reflected in increased growth-oriented expenditure and business attraction, while environmental protection expenditure did not increase significantly. The negative ecological effects are amplified in counties facing stronger economic pressures but mitigated where environmental performance metrics are included in official evaluations. These findings reveal important trade-offs in decentralized environmental governance and highlight how institutional incentives can shape local governments’ environmental decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2706691
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does local empowerment come at an ecological cost? Evidence from China’s county power expansion reform

Chu-Yu Guo, Zhida Jin
Applied Economics
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Does local empowerment come at an ecological cost? Evidence from China’s county power expansion reform

Chu-Yu Guo, Zhida Jin
article en

Abstract

This study examines how enhanced local autonomy affects ecological quality by analysing China’s County Power Expansion reform, which granted unprecedented fiscal and administrative powers to county governments. Using a comprehensive ecological index that captures multiple environmental dimensions, we find that the reform is associated with a decline of 0.64 index points in local ecological quality. This deterioration is associated with a stronger prioritization of economic development, reflected in increased growth-oriented expenditure and business attraction, while environmental protection expenditure did not increase significantly. The negative ecological effects are amplified in counties facing stronger economic pressures but mitigated where environmental performance metrics are included in official evaluations. These findings reveal important trade-offs in decentralized environmental governance and highlight how institutional incentives can shape local governments’ environmental decisions.

Applied Economics
Wuhan University of Technology (CN), Center of Hubei Cooperative Innovation for Emissions Trading System (CN), Hubei University of Education (CN), Hubei University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does local empowerment come at an ecological cost? Evidence from China’s county power expansion reform — Chu-Yu Guo, Zhida Jin · Applied Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS