Anatomy-based fitting for cochlear implant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Frequency-to-place mismatch is the discrepancy between the frequency information delivered by a cochlear implant electrode and the natural cochlear place frequency location that is stimulated. Frequency-to-place mismatch has been shown to negatively influence cochlear implant outcomes. Anatomy-based fitting (ABF) aligns filter frequencies with cochlear frequency place to minimize or eliminate frequency-to-place mismatches. This article reviews the current evidence on variability in electrode array placement, influence of frequency-to-place mismatches on cochlear implant recipient outcomes, and effectiveness of ABF procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Most ABF procedures identify the angular insertion depth of the electrode contacts using imaging, calculate the cochlear place frequency, and then adjust filter frequencies for each electrode contact to match the cochlear place frequencies. While the specific approach varies across ABF procedures, studies generally report improvements in speech recognition in noise, music perception, user satisfaction, and/or sound quality as compared to default maps. What remains unclear are the long-term outcomes between default and ABF procedures, if there is a preferred frequency-to-place function when determining cochlear place, and whether there is an optimal ABF procedure for cochlear implant and electric-acoustic stimulation device users. SUMMARY: Early evidence of cochlear implant recipients listening with ABF maps demonstrates better results compared to maps with default settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0000000000001146
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anatomy-based fitting for cochlear implant recipients

Saangyoung E. Lee, Kevin D. Brown, Margaret T. Dillon
Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Anatomy-based fitting for cochlear implant recipients

Saangyoung E. Lee, Kevin D. Brown, Margaret T. Dillon
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Frequency-to-place mismatch is the discrepancy between the frequency information delivered by a cochlear implant electrode and the natural cochlear place frequency location that is stimulated. Frequency-to-place mismatch has been shown to negatively influence cochlear implant outcomes. Anatomy-based fitting (ABF) aligns filter frequencies with cochlear frequency place to minimize or eliminate frequency-to-place mismatches. This article reviews the current evidence on variability in electrode array placement, influence of frequency-to-place mismatches on cochlear implant recipient outcomes, and effectiveness of ABF procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Most ABF procedures identify the angular insertion depth of the electrode contacts using imaging, calculate the cochlear place frequency, and then adjust filter frequencies for each electrode contact to match the cochlear place frequencies. While the specific approach varies across ABF procedures, studies generally report improvements in speech recognition in noise, music perception, user satisfaction, and/or sound quality as compared to default maps. What remains unclear are the long-term outcomes between default and ABF procedures, if there is a preferred frequency-to-place function when determining cochlear place, and whether there is an optimal ABF procedure for cochlear implant and electric-acoustic stimulation device users. SUMMARY: Early evidence of cochlear implant recipients listening with ABF maps demonstrates better results compared to maps with default settings.

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.