Survival implications of non-organized breast cancer screening in a Brazilian tertiary women’s health center: a retrospective cohort study of 1517 patients

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy among Brazilian women. Advanced-stage diagnosis remains frequent, largely due to limited access to screening and treatment. Despite national recommendations for organised screening, implementation remains opportunistic. This study compared prognostic outcomes between clinically detected and opportunistically screened breast cancers and estimated Years of Life Lost (YLL) and Years of Disease-Free Life Lost (YDFL) to quantify the impact of clinical stage on survival and disease-free survival expectancy. A retrospective cohort of 1,517 women with unilateral, invasive, non-metastatic BC who underwent surgery at a tertiary public hospital in Brazil between 2012 and 2016 was analysed. Patients were classified as symptomatic (diagnosed based on clinical signs and symptoms) or asymptomatic (diagnosed through screening). Clinicopathological features, treatments, and outcomes were compared using the Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Survival was analysed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox regression models. YLL and YDFL were derived from Weibull survival models, using stage I patients as the reference. Most patients (69.5%) were symptomatic at diagnosis, with palpable tumours in 94.3%. Compared with asymptomatic cases, symptomatic women were younger and presented with more advanced stages, and aggressive tumours. They more frequently underwent mastectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p < 0.001). Both YLL and YDFL increased progressively with advancing clinical stage, reaching over 15 years in stage III. The predominance of advanced-stage diagnoses may reflect limitations in the current implementation of opportunistic screening, although this interpretation should be considered in light of potential screening-related biases. Advanced disease was associated with substantial loss of lifetime and disease-free years, reinforcing the prognostic value of early-stage detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16626-7
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival implications of non-organized breast cancer screening in a Brazilian tertiary women’s health center: a retrospective cohort study of 1517 patients

Giuliano Mendes Duarte, Cássio Cardoso-Filho, Júlia Yoriko Shinzato, Natalie Rios Almeida et al.
BMC Cancer
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Survival implications of non-organized breast cancer screening in a Brazilian tertiary women’s health center: a retrospective cohort study of 1517 patients

Giuliano Mendes Duarte, Cássio Cardoso-Filho, Júlia Yoriko Shinzato, Natalie Rios Almeida, Renato Zocchio Torresan, Luíz Carlos Zeferino, Nicoli Serquiz de Azevedo, Fabrício Palermo Brenelli, César Cabello, Luis Otávio Zanatta Sarian, Maria Beatriz de Paula Leite Kraft
article en

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy among Brazilian women. Advanced-stage diagnosis remains frequent, largely due to limited access to screening and treatment. Despite national recommendations for organised screening, implementation remains opportunistic. This study compared prognostic outcomes between clinically detected and opportunistically screened breast cancers and estimated Years of Life Lost (YLL) and Years of Disease-Free Life Lost (YDFL) to quantify the impact of clinical stage on survival and disease-free survival expectancy. A retrospective cohort of 1,517 women with unilateral, invasive, non-metastatic BC who underwent surgery at a tertiary public hospital in Brazil between 2012 and 2016 was analysed. Patients were classified as symptomatic (diagnosed based on clinical signs and symptoms) or asymptomatic (diagnosed through screening). Clinicopathological features, treatments, and outcomes were compared using the Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Survival was analysed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox regression models. YLL and YDFL were derived from Weibull survival models, using stage I patients as the reference. Most patients (69.5%) were symptomatic at diagnosis, with palpable tumours in 94.3%. Compared with asymptomatic cases, symptomatic women were younger and presented with more advanced stages, and aggressive tumours. They more frequently underwent mastectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p < 0.001). Both YLL and YDFL increased progressively with advancing clinical stage, reaching over 15 years in stage III. The predominance of advanced-stage diagnoses may reflect limitations in the current implementation of opportunistic screening, although this interpretation should be considered in light of potential screening-related biases. Advanced disease was associated with substantial loss of lifetime and disease-free years, reinforcing the prognostic value of early-stage detection.

BMC Cancer
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR), Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.