Systemic perspective on contemporary biodesign

Abstract Biodesign is increasingly recognised as a promising life-centred design field, yet its implementation within Industrial Design Engineering Technology remains limited. This study investigates the research question: “What systemic structures hinder advancement of biodesign?” . Drawing on extensive interviews with 21 pioneering biodesign experts (n=21) and qualitatively analysed through a systems-oriented perspective, the findings reveal that barriers are not isolated practical issues but rooted in deeper systemic structures across several system depths – from competencies to agency, design briefs, tools, and processes. Four constraining systemic structures were identified: limits to growth (accessibility), eroding goals (expectations of biodesign projects), growth and underinvestment (invest in biodesign competencies), and tragedy of the commons (knowledge restrictions in biodesign). Together, these indicate that biodesign’s limited advancement stems from systemic misalignment rather than technological immaturity. The study advocates coordinated systemic interventions at deeper system depths to enable cumulative, long-term advancement of the biodesign field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Directions Biotechnology Design
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s2977905726100638
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic perspective on contemporary biodesign

Jan Detand, Francesca Ostuzzi, Bert Vuylsteke
Research Directions Biotechnology Design
Design Education and Practice
article

Systemic perspective on contemporary biodesign

Jan Detand, Francesca Ostuzzi, Bert Vuylsteke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Biodesign is increasingly recognised as a promising life-centred design field, yet its implementation within Industrial Design Engineering Technology remains limited. This study investigates the research question: “What systemic structures hinder advancement of biodesign?” . Drawing on extensive interviews with 21 pioneering biodesign experts (n=21) and qualitatively analysed through a systems-oriented perspective, the findings reveal that barriers are not isolated practical issues but rooted in deeper systemic structures across several system depths – from competencies to agency, design briefs, tools, and processes. Four constraining systemic structures were identified: limits to growth (accessibility), eroding goals (expectations of biodesign projects), growth and underinvestment (invest in biodesign competencies), and tragedy of the commons (knowledge restrictions in biodesign). Together, these indicate that biodesign’s limited advancement stems from systemic misalignment rather than technological immaturity. The study advocates coordinated systemic interventions at deeper system depths to enable cumulative, long-term advancement of the biodesign field.

Research Directions Biotechnology Design
University College West Flanders (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Systemic perspective on contemporary biodesign — Jan Detand, Francesca Ostuzzi, et al. · Research Directions Biotechnology Design (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS