Associations between couples’ work–life balance and pregnant women’s quality of life in Japan: a cross-sectional dyadic study

Abstract Background In dual-income couples, maintaining pregnant women’s quality of life (QOL) while achieving work–life balance (WLB) is essential. This study examined the association between WLB and pregnant women’s QOL among dual-income couples at different stages of pregnancy. Methods This cross-sectional, dyadic study included pregnant women and their husbands ( N = 150 couples). Paired questionnaires were distributed in cooperation with obstetric facilities in Japan. Participants were categorized into the first, second, and third trimesters for stratified analysis. WLB was assessed using the Japanese version of the Survey Work–Home Interaction–Nijmegen (SWING-J), which comprises four subscales: work-to-family negative spillover (WFNS), family-to-work negative spillover, work-to-family positive spillover, and family-to-work positive spillover (FWPS). QOL was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed after adjusting for marital relationship quality (Quality Marriage Index). Results No significant association was observed between WLB and QOL in the first and second trimesters. In the third trimester, higher WFNS among pregnant women was significantly associated with lower QOL (aOR = 0.179, 95% CI = 0.038–0.832). Regarding husbands’ WLB, higher WFNS was positively associated with pregnant women’s QOL (aOR = 11.168, 95% CI = 1.443–86.419), whereas higher FWPS was negatively associated with pregnant women’s QOL (aOR = 0.063, 95% CI = 0.007–0.554). Conclusion In the third trimester, pregnant women’s QOL was associated with both negative and positive aspects of WLB at the couple level. Higher WFNS among pregnant women and higher FWPS among husbands were associated with a lower QOL, whereas higher WFNS was associated with a higher QOL. These findings suggest that multiple WLB-related factors, both negative and positive, are linked to pregnant women’s QOL, highlighting the importance of considering complex spillover dynamics when supporting maternal well-being in dual-income households.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09733-7
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations between couples’ work–life balance and pregnant women’s quality of life in Japan: a cross-sectional dyadic study

A. Makino, Shigemi Iriyama
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Associations between couples’ work–life balance and pregnant women’s quality of life in Japan: a cross-sectional dyadic study

A. Makino, Shigemi Iriyama
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In dual-income couples, maintaining pregnant women’s quality of life (QOL) while achieving work–life balance (WLB) is essential. This study examined the association between WLB and pregnant women’s QOL among dual-income couples at different stages of pregnancy. Methods This cross-sectional, dyadic study included pregnant women and their husbands ( N = 150 couples). Paired questionnaires were distributed in cooperation with obstetric facilities in Japan. Participants were categorized into the first, second, and third trimesters for stratified analysis. WLB was assessed using the Japanese version of the Survey Work–Home Interaction–Nijmegen (SWING-J), which comprises four subscales: work-to-family negative spillover (WFNS), family-to-work negative spillover, work-to-family positive spillover, and family-to-work positive spillover (FWPS). QOL was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed after adjusting for marital relationship quality (Quality Marriage Index). Results No significant association was observed between WLB and QOL in the first and second trimesters. In the third trimester, higher WFNS among pregnant women was significantly associated with lower QOL (aOR = 0.179, 95% CI = 0.038–0.832). Regarding husbands’ WLB, higher WFNS was positively associated with pregnant women’s QOL (aOR = 11.168, 95% CI = 1.443–86.419), whereas higher FWPS was negatively associated with pregnant women’s QOL (aOR = 0.063, 95% CI = 0.007–0.554). Conclusion In the third trimester, pregnant women’s QOL was associated with both negative and positive aspects of WLB at the couple level. Higher WFNS among pregnant women and higher FWPS among husbands were associated with a lower QOL, whereas higher WFNS was associated with a higher QOL. These findings suggest that multiple WLB-related factors, both negative and positive, are linked to pregnant women’s QOL, highlighting the importance of considering complex spillover dynamics when supporting maternal well-being in dual-income households.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Nagoya University (JP), Fukui Prefectural University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.