Subcategorisation of Data for AI Models in Healthcare: A Case Study in Mammography

Background/Objectives: Accurate data subcategorising is vital for reliability and traceability in the training and validation of all artificial intelligence (AI) models. Methods: In this paper we show the complexity of clinical and technical features likely to affect the appearance and interpretation of mammography images and in turn affect the output of AI software used to aid clinical decisions. Results: Using mammography as a case study, the equitability covers screened population characteristics (e.g., women’s age and ethnicity) and image acquisition key factors (e.g., brand of system, exposure factors, image processing). We examine some studies and available datasets of mammography images, summarising the metadata available. Conclusions: We recommend that, where possible, AI models are trained and evaluated using data that includes subcategories based on these features, ensuring increased equitability in the data and coverage of image heterogeneities; or, where not possible, that the subcategories for which the AI model is valid are clearly defined. Such practices can easily be implemented in a wide range of AI applications but are illustrated here with mammography. Clinical Relevance: Reliable AI holds invaluable potential for both clinical efficiency and accuracy in diagnosis. With appropriately categorised training data, a reduction in subjective assessment can be achieved, leading to trustworthy and rapid assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152367
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subcategorisation of Data for AI Models in Healthcare: A Case Study in Mammography

Alistair Mackenzie, Spencer A. Thomas, Jenny Venton, Elizabeth A. Cooke et al.
Diagnostics
AI in cancer detection
article

Subcategorisation of Data for AI Models in Healthcare: A Case Study in Mammography

Alistair Mackenzie, Spencer A. Thomas, Jenny Venton, Elizabeth A. Cooke, Nadia Smith, Ruben E. van Engen, Carlijn Roozemond, Jessica E. Goldring
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Accurate data subcategorising is vital for reliability and traceability in the training and validation of all artificial intelligence (AI) models. Methods: In this paper we show the complexity of clinical and technical features likely to affect the appearance and interpretation of mammography images and in turn affect the output of AI software used to aid clinical decisions. Results: Using mammography as a case study, the equitability covers screened population characteristics (e.g., women’s age and ethnicity) and image acquisition key factors (e.g., brand of system, exposure factors, image processing). We examine some studies and available datasets of mammography images, summarising the metadata available. Conclusions: We recommend that, where possible, AI models are trained and evaluated using data that includes subcategories based on these features, ensuring increased equitability in the data and coverage of image heterogeneities; or, where not possible, that the subcategories for which the AI model is valid are clearly defined. Such practices can easily be implemented in a wide range of AI applications but are illustrated here with mammography. Clinical Relevance: Reliable AI holds invaluable potential for both clinical efficiency and accuracy in diagnosis. With appropriately categorised training data, a reduction in subjective assessment can be achieved, leading to trustworthy and rapid assessment.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(15)
National Physical Laboratory (GB), National Nuclear Laboratory (GB), Dutch Expert Centre for Screening (NL), Institute of Child Health (GR), Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.