Introduction of a remediation process to support student learning in veterinary immunology 2308929

Abstract Introduction The veterinary curriculum is challenging, and individual students sometimes need additional opportunities to assimilate content. Accordingly, we developed and implemented a structured remediation process, called Upgrade, for veterinary immunology to support student learning by promoting content mastery, encouraging self-reflective learning strategies, and mitigating academic stress. This formal remediation process occurs during the semester and provides a structure for students to further engage with the content and have a second chance to demonstrate mastery. Methods Students are eligible any time they score below 70% on an exam; there are three exams, and students must achieve an overall grade ≥ 70% to pass the course. The remediation process has two levels depending on the student’s exam score: 1) students scoring 60—69.99% complete annotations of incorrect exam questions, and 2) students scoring < 60% complete exam annotations, meet individually with the course coordinator, and take an online exam on content specific to the unit. Students who successfully complete the process have their exam score amended to a 70% (or the higher of the two exam scores, if they take the online exam but score < 70%). This process was implemented in Spring 2025, and students were surveyed at the end of the academic year. Results Students who remediated an exam found the process to be helpful, not only for raising their grades but also for enhancing their learning. Most survey respondents did not need to remediate an exam but still perceived benefits from knowing the option was available, describing lower stress levels and a more conducive learning environment as positive aspects. Conclusion Incorporation of this structured remediation process into a veterinary immunology course promoted student learning, facilitated communication with struggling students, and contributed to a positive learning environment. Funding Source N/A Topic Categories Immunology Education and Communication (EDU)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jimmun/vkag141.1477
Primary Topic
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction of a remediation process to support student learning in veterinary immunology 2308929

Debra Freedman, Emily Truckenbrod
The Journal of Immunology
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
article

Introduction of a remediation process to support student learning in veterinary immunology 2308929

Debra Freedman, Emily Truckenbrod
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The veterinary curriculum is challenging, and individual students sometimes need additional opportunities to assimilate content. Accordingly, we developed and implemented a structured remediation process, called Upgrade, for veterinary immunology to support student learning by promoting content mastery, encouraging self-reflective learning strategies, and mitigating academic stress. This formal remediation process occurs during the semester and provides a structure for students to further engage with the content and have a second chance to demonstrate mastery. Methods Students are eligible any time they score below 70% on an exam; there are three exams, and students must achieve an overall grade ≥ 70% to pass the course. The remediation process has two levels depending on the student’s exam score: 1) students scoring 60—69.99% complete annotations of incorrect exam questions, and 2) students scoring < 60% complete exam annotations, meet individually with the course coordinator, and take an online exam on content specific to the unit. Students who successfully complete the process have their exam score amended to a 70% (or the higher of the two exam scores, if they take the online exam but score < 70%). This process was implemented in Spring 2025, and students were surveyed at the end of the academic year. Results Students who remediated an exam found the process to be helpful, not only for raising their grades but also for enhancing their learning. Most survey respondents did not need to remediate an exam but still perceived benefits from knowing the option was available, describing lower stress levels and a more conducive learning environment as positive aspects. Conclusion Incorporation of this structured remediation process into a veterinary immunology course promoted student learning, facilitated communication with struggling students, and contributed to a positive learning environment. Funding Source N/A Topic Categories Immunology Education and Communication (EDU)

The Journal of ImmunologyVol. 215(Supplement_1)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.